From PreparingYou
Jump to: navigation, search
Should vaccines be mandatory? If you do not have a right to say "no" then it is not your body and you are not free. If you want to be free then you should repent and stop trying to take away the rights of others.
In a recent Peer-Reviewed Study of Vaccinated Children vs Unvaccinated Children the Vaccinated children were 300 to 470% more likely to have been diagnosed with some kind of neurodevelopmental disorders including Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) 4.7 fold higher, ADHD was 4.7 fold higher and learning disability 3.7 higher.

Natural Immunity

Download Recording #4 or press play

Natural immunity. The ability to resist infection that does not depend on prior experience of the invading organism and the resultant production of antibodies or amendment or selection of LYMPHOCYTES. Natural immunity is a general and non-specific resistance to infection possessed by all healthy individuals.

If you get a disease, like measles or rubella, you typically have life-long immunity and won’t get it again. You are also stimulating your immune system to protect against the next infection.

Definition of Immunity

Immunity; 1. Protection against infectious disease by either specific or non-specific mechanisms. 2. Pertaining to the immune system or immune response [Ingelfinger, F. Dorland’s Medical Dictionary Saunders Press, 1999.]

Innate immunity

Innate immunity is the resistance manifested by a species (or by races, families, and individuals in a species) that has not been immunized (sensitized, allergized) by previous infection or vaccination; much of it results from body mechanisms that are poorly understood but differ from those responsible for the altered reactivity associated with the specific nature of acquired immunity; in general, innate immunity is nonspecific and is not stimulated by specific antigens.

  • "Our body’s immune response is a multifaceted interaction between molecules, cells, and organs. " [1]

Did a Vaccine Eradicate Polio

While we know Correlation is not Causation the time frame for the eradication of polio and other diseases does not actually correlate with the actual decrease in infections. It actually appears that true herd immunity was reached through the natural process and not by way of vaccines.

People imagine that they know the dangers of Polio and actually believe that vaccines eradicated polio because after the vaccines were given to thousands of people Polio seemed to disappear.

Albert Everyman believed the only thing that saved kids during these polio outbreaks was the vaccines. So when he is told that we should not make vaccines mandatory he disagrees. He thinks we need to keep people safe and the only way to do that is to vaccinate everyone. Is he right or is it possible that mandatory vaccinations may actually create an environment conducive to creating more harmful viruses in the future to say nothing of the injuries often caused by vaccination?

Albert is hoping people will "listen to reason" based on what he believes are the facts about polio and argues:

"you are too young so you don't know what it was like. It was scary because you didn't know who could give you some terrible sickness that would harm or kill you! Did you ever hear about "polio pond"? Swimming was a risk! Vaccinations & shots almost put an end to many of the diseases & to most of the fear we had faced. But too many forgot or just never faced these illnesses & didn't bother to get the vaccinations & shots so now some of these diseases are coming back! I hope you don't find out the hard way with a sick or dead child. Look at history. People used to have lots of children because often some died! The issue is keeping all these killing diseases at bay!"

Is Albert right?

The truth seems to be something quite different from what people want to believe and it will often take an objective examination, patience and some humility to receive and understand the whole truth.

  • “Polioviruses are transient inhabitants of the gastrointestinal tract. Up to 95% of all polio infections are completely asymptomatic. Approximately 5% of polio infections consist of a minor, nonspecific illness consisting of an upper respiratory tract infection (sore throat and fever) and gastrointestinal disturbances (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea). This influenza-like illness, clinically indistinguishable from the myriad of other viral illnesses, is characterized by complete recovery in less than a week with resultant life time immunity. Less than 1% of all polio infections result in paralysis. Most importantly, the vast majority of individuals who contract paralytic poliomyelitis recover with complete—or near complete—return of muscle function. Any weakness that is still present 12 months after onset of paralysis is usually considered permanent.“[2]

What does this mean?

Since “Polioviruses" will likely pass into and through the gastrointestinal tract, your stomach and guts, if you go swimming in Albert's "polio pond" and ingest some of the water.

How will he know if you have been infected with the “Polioviruses"?

Up to "95% of all polio infections are completely asymptomatic" meaning if he is infected with the scary and deadly Polioviruses Albert will likely be "producing or showing no symptoms. That is because 95 people out of a hundred will never even know they were infected with polio and yet they are likely immune. They may continue to fear infection but are actually safe and immune.

That 5% with a polio infection could manifest as a minor, nonspecific illness that might appear as an upper respiratory infection with a sore throat and fever. That means 5 people out of a hundred may show some symptoms which may just appear as a common cold or flu. They might show a gastrointestinal disturbance like nausea or vomiting. They may experience some abdominal pain and diarrhea resulting in a complete recovery in a few days or less than a week walking away with lifetime immunity.

He may not have any idea that he now has a lifetime of immunity to most strains of Polioviruses and his immune system will be better equipped to fight any new strains of a multitude of other viruses.

Less than one in a hundred people coming out of the "polio pond" would experience a polio infection that would result in paralysis and "the vast majority of those individuals who contract paralytic poliomyelitis recover with complete—or near complete—return of muscle function."

What does this mean?

Many of the people who received the vaccinations were possibly already immune. Those that got intermuscular shots but were not immune already may have been able to carry and even spread polio because they did not have gastrointestinal immunity. People can actually be infected with polio through "mandatory vaccinations" as we see in the Congressional_Record and according to the testimony in 1977 of Dr. Jonas Salk, who "with other scientists" stated that mass inoculation against polio was the cause of most polio cases throughout the USA since 1961.[3]

Herd immunity

Herd immunity is said to be "the resistance to the spread of a contagious disease within a population that results if a sufficiently high proportion of individuals are immune to the disease, especially through vaccination." Can you truly obtain herd immunity through vaccination? The original formulation of the herd immunity theory by Dr. Arthur W. Hedrich, a health officer in Chicago, Illinois, was based on unvaccinated populations. A vaccine-induced immunity is not only more “temporary” it also has allowed the disease to be carried, spread and even mutate. We have also seen were vaccinations have increased cases by infecting the population with the disease both in the past and at the present time.[4] True and natural herd immunity exists only if immunity can be passed from "generation to generation" which is a product of naturally obtained immunity and is not common among vaccinated populations because of low efficacy and temporary nature of vaccine immunity requiring regular boosters.

The only effective way to obtain Herd immunity is through promotion of good health in the 5 main structures of the immune system and hygienic practices on individual and social levels. It is clear from the record 95% of the people who contracted polio showed no symptoms and the larger percentage of those who did develop visible symptoms never manifested any lasting paralysis. That means that society developed natural herd immunity even without vaccination. Many of those who did develop polio symptoms and paralysis may have been able to gain immunity without physical injury had they known about and practiced better immune system health.

Herd immunity should be a concept by which an infectious agent can no longer spread across a population because a sufficiently large percentage of individuals have immunity and are passing that immunity on to the next generation.

An acquired immunity from vaccination not only does not usually pass from one generation to the next but vaccination often allows an individual to continue to carry a disease even though they are not manifesting full-blown symptoms.[5] We see this with Whooping cough where the vaccinated individual has no lung immunity but is internally immune. Only a natural immunity will include both internal and lung immunity.

Reinfection appears to be uncommon but does occur. Studies show[6] that "on average, whooping cough immunity lasts at least 30 years and perhaps as long as 70 years after natural infection... And when people whose immunity has waned are re-exposed to whooping cough, they rarely become infected. In fact, their immunity to the disease may be boosted by re-exposure, the study suggests."

Studies[7] have also shown that the transfer of maternal immunity can protect the newborn against infection with Bordetella pertussis if the infant is allowed to suckle colostrum and milk for 4 to 5 days from a mother who has previously obtained a natural immunity to pertussis. Yes, mothers pass on protective antibodies to their babies during breastfeeding for a variety of infectious diseases, including the flu. Antibodies are a type of protein made by the immune system when a person is exposed to a disease.

Teens have very little protection just a few years after vaccination and studies have shown that boosters only add as little as a year to internal immunity. Teenagers are accounting for a growing proportion of pertussis cases in the US because of the short life of vaccine-acquired immunity. The Tdap booster shot routinely given to preteen children has a poor "safety profile" because it can "cause high fevers and seizures in young children" according to Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center and a professor of infectious diseases at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

True herd immunity must afford protection to the next generation.

People imagine that they know the dangers of Polio and actually believe that vaccines eradicated polio because after the vaccines were given to thousands of people Polio seemed to disappear.

Correlation is not Causation

Vaccines do not cure disease.

At best they can only stimulate a part of your immune system to prepare that part to fight the viral infection. Has the introduction of vaccines actually lowered the occurrence of infectious diseases over the last century? Are there other factors which have contributed even more to the health of the community?

"Krause wrote “before the introduction of modern sanitation, polio infection was acquired during infancy, at which time it seldom caused paralysis but provided lifelong immunity against polio infection and paralysis later in life” [8]" [9]

"According to the British Association for the Advancement of Science, childhood diseases decreased 90% between 1850 and 1940, paralleling improved sanitation and hygienic practices, well before mandatory vaccination programs. The Medical Sentinel recently reported, “from 1911 to 1935, the four leading causes of childhood deaths from infectious diseases in the U.S. were diphtheria, pertussis, scarlet fever, and measles. However, by 1945 the combined death rates from these causes had declined by 95 percent, before the implementation of mass immunization programs.”[10]"[11]

It should be clear that because a particular disease seems to disappear at the same time that a vaccine is administered to a population does not mean that the vaccine is the critical cause that reduced the infection.

The Forgotten Pandemic

Spanish Flu, a H1N1 influenza virus sometimes called the "forgotten pandemic", infected 500 million people around the world killing up to 5% of the world population. It contributed to the death of more people in a year than the Black Death killed in a century, making it one of the deadliest natural disasters in human history. We are told that "In the U.S., about 28% of the population became infected, and 500,000 to 675,000 died."[12]

Could it be possible, as we have seen with polio, that only "500,000 to 675,000" showed visible signs of being infected? In fact, far more people who ingested the virus, were likely infected but developed natural immunity asymptomatically?

We know that when an infected person sneezes or coughs, more than half a million virus particles can be spread to anyone near them. There were also several strains of the same virus caused by mutations that commonly occur when a large population is infected.

It is far more likely that more than half of the population was infected but became immune naturally, eventually establishing herd immunity without the introduction of any vaccines ending the epidemic.

It is believed that circumstances of World War I troop movements, malnourishment, overcrowded medical camps and hospitals, poor hygiene promoted a bacterial superinfection that accompanied the virus and killed most of the victims.

Besides exposure, because of the movement of large infected groups during the war, the simultaneous improvement in "hygiene" and sewage disposal and fresh water probably contributed far more to the survivability of a disease like Spanish flu. Other factors like "malnourishment", were also being improved as diet improved among the general population. Another factor was that people could be cared for in the home rather than send them to "overcrowded medical camps and hospitals" where other infections can add to the problems.

Since no vaccine was created we know that Spanish Flu was no eradicated by it but it went away none the less. Knowing this why would people jump to the conclusion that the people were saved from polio by a vaccine?

While we know that "Correlation is not Causation" we can see “before the introduction of modern sanitation, polio infection was acquired during infancy, at which time it seldom caused paralysis but provided lifelong immunity against polio infection and paralysis later in life” [13]. [9]

The idea that vaccines are ending epidemics that come and go throughout history without the introduction of vaccines is wishful thinking that borders on superstition.

People want to have faith in the medical industry hoping that it can save them from the unknown invisible threats lurking in the world. Once they have accepted this way of faith in medicine and vaccines it is hard to let go of that faith.

But doctors are not God and we should not expect them to be gods nor infallible. They make mistakes and those mistakes can cost lives.

Karen Starko proposed in the journal Clinical Infectious Diseases, that aspirin poisoning contributed substantially to the fatalities of Spanish Flu. Both the Surgeon General of the United States Army and the Journal of the American Medical Association recommended very large doses of 8 to 31 grams of aspirin per day as part of treatment. These levels will produce hyperventilation in 33% of patients, as well as lung edema in 3% of patients. Bayer's patent on aspirin expired, and many companies rushed in to make a profit and greatly increased the supply worldwide. Were there other practices and treatment that contributed to the high mortality rate?

Under Reporting

Can Under Reporting or change in the way you collect data create a strong delusion?

"The National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC, a grassroots organization founded by parents of vaccine-injured and killed children) has conducted its own investigations.[14] It reported: “In New York, only one out of 40 doctor's offices confirmed that they report a death or injury following vaccination.” In other words, 97.5% of vaccine related deaths and disabilities go unreported there. Implications about medical ethics aside (federal law directs doctors to report serious adverse events [15]), these findings suggest that vaccine deaths and serious injuries actually occurring may be from 10 to 100 times greater than the number reported."[11]

"These observations were especially important in the tropics, as Spalding emphasized in discussing poliomyelitis: “the disease is endemic and the virus is ubiquitous. Children who are exposed to it at a very early age rarely suffer permanent damage and acquire immunity” [16] (p. 800)" [9]

The Congressional Record

The Congressional Record (among other sources) records these facts from both Sabin and Salk:

"Six New England states reported increases in polio one year after the Salk vaccine was introduced, ranging from more than doubling in Vermont to Massachusetts’ astounding increase of 642%; other states reported increases as well. The incidence in Wisconsin increased by a factor of five. Idaho and Utah actually halted vaccination due to the increased incidence and death rate. In 1959, 77.5% of Massachusetts’ paralytic cases had received 3 doses of IPV (injected polio vaccine). During 1962 U.S. Congressional hearings, Dr. Bernard Greenberg, head of the Dept. of Biostatistics for the University of North Carolina School of Public Health, testified that not only did the cases of polio increase substantially after mandatory vaccinations—a 50% increase from 1957 to 1958, and an 80% increase from 1958 to 1959—but that the statistics were deliberately manipulated by the Public Health Service to give the opposite impression.([17]) It is important to understand that the polio vaccine was not universally accepted, at least initially. Despite this, polio declined both in European countries that refused mass vaccination as well as in those that employed it." [18]

Why did some people's immune system fail to protect them?

Was it the consumption of sugar through eating to much ice cream?

Could proper diet make that much difference to your innate immunity during times of outbreak?

Cultivating Plague

Can more Vaccinations reintroduce a plagues more immune to medical cures?

Individuals vaccinated with live virus vaccines such as Polio, MMR, rotavirus, chicken pox, shingles, and influenza can infect others while displaying no symptoms of a disease by shedding the virus for weeks or months.[19]

As a recent example the U.S. Navy warship Fort McHenry while deployed to the Persian Gulf, was quarantined at sea because of a Viral Mumps Outbreak which spread through the sailors and Marines despite the fact that they had all been vaccinated with the MMR vaccine. The vaccine for mumps is said to be only 88% effective. Since the ship spent 160 days at sea due to war-time operations and the incubation period for the mumps is 25 days then where did the original infection come from?

As was testified in the Congressional_Record by Dr. Jonas Salk many people have actually be infected with polio through vaccinations.[3] We see the same CDC data concerning vaccinations showing increased cases by infecting the population Syria and the Congo through vaccinations and not the wild virus.[4]

Vaccinated people can put others at risk including unvaccinated and vaccinated individuals. Vaccines will sometimes fail to provide immunity. Vaccine-induced immunity is has been temporary with recent outbreaks of whooping cough, mumps and measles have occurred in fully vaccinated populations.[20]

Regular Flu Vaccination increase Risk of a more serious Pandemic.

"Researchers, led by Vancouver's Dr. Danuta Skowronski, an influenza expert at the B.C. Centre for Disease Control, noticed in the early weeks of the [2009 H1N1] pandemic that people who got a flu shot for the 2008-09 winter seemed to be more likely to get infected with the pandemic virus than people who hadn't received a flu shot. Five studies done in several provinces showed the same unsettling results."[21]

Not only can a vaccinated community still spread the infection the vaccine itself may endanger society to greater infections. Dr. Jonas Salk himself testified in 1977 was the 'principal if not sole cause' of all reported polio cases in the U.S. since 1961.[3] The CDC admitted the same thing in 1992."[22]

"The above statement(of Dr. Salk}[3] states the truth of the vaccine in a nutshell. The Polio vaccine only increased the amount of cases of Polio when it was introduced and it had no part in actually creating a decline in the disease. The decline was happening naturally and the vaccine was introduced on a down turn of Polio cases. While the introduction of the vaccine created a spike in cases, overall the disease continued to decline. Especially in countries that did not introduce the vaccine. This is strong evidence showing that the Polio vaccine is not responsible for the decline and should negate the belief and statement that the Polio vaccine demonstrates vaccine success." [18]

Vaccination in the third world are actually spreading the poliovirus cVDPV2 strain and creating a worldwide "risk of international spread" threat because their vaccines are actually causing people to be infected with polio.[23]

  • "At present, as a result of the WHO initiative, the wild virus is now confined to a few countries, but naturally acquired immunity has been lost, and the whole of the developing world is now vulnerable to epidemics of poliomyelitis, which could lead to severe paralysis and increased mortality. "[9]

Any vaccines given as intramuscular injection does not give full gastrointestinal immunity and allows people to carry the virus and spread it to others.[5] It is a well-admitted fact that "the virus can continue circulating for years, accumulating mutations until it reverts to its dangerous form. The vast majority of cVDPVs are caused by serotype 2, one of three variants of the virus."[24]

  • "Because no vaccination is 100% effective, some vaccinated individuals will get the disease as well. In fact, during an outbreak, the number of vaccinated individuals who get sick will often outnumber the unvaccinated people who get sick."[25]

Vaccines inject foreign DNA into your body. Those who get sick anyway may facilitate mutations of the existing virus producing a new, even superbug.


Besides the known toxins in vaccines, long term effects are unclear.

  • "Finally, the agent in the vaccine should be free of contaminating substances. It is also recognized, however, that vaccine transmissibility can be helpful—e.g., in the case of live polio vaccine, which can be spread from vaccinated children to others who have not been vaccinated." [26]

Yes, vaccines can have tremendous side effects that span over your entire life. See Polio Vaccine and Cancer


Join The Living Network of The Companies of Ten
The Living Network | Join Local group | About | Purpose | Guidelines | Network Removal
Contact Minister | Fractal Network | Audacity of Hope | Network Links

Merck Whistleblower

Former Merck Rep Says Mandatory Vaccination Is For Profit and Not Public Health. Stop Mandatory Vaccination Time 9:45

Brandy Vaughan is a former sales rep for Merck & Co. - a vaccine maker - and she details how vaccine companies are using vaccines as a vehicle for massive profit and not public health. Brandy researched the safety of vaccines and found that not only do vaccines contain known toxins that can cause neurological damage, but that vaccine makers do not create the same safety studies for vaccines as they do for other drugs. This lack of true safety research of vaccines combined with the known adverse reactions to vaccination has helped Brandy to decide to never vaccinate her own child. Brandy says giving children a vaccine is like playing Russian roulette with our children and that mandatory vaccination is simply a way for vaccine makers to profit off of our children. Don’t be fooled: we do not need mandatory vaccination.

Silent Epidemic; The Untold Story of Vaccines - Movie - directed by Gary Null. Time 1:48:05

Truth behind the CDC, Vaccines and Autism

Truth behind the CDC, Vaccines and Autism. Ben Swan.also at Time 24:02

Ben Swann's Truth in Media and producer of the investigative film exposing a CDC cover-up in "Truth in Media: CDC, Vaccines and Autism". The exponential growth in the incidence of autism among our youth has become a national concern, but unfortunately, subject to much debate. As a result of the investigative work by Truth In Media, we now have a video to help clarify the issue.


Protecting your children is your responsibility and the responsibility of everyone in your society.

We would like to think that Vaccines are saving lives.

We would like to think that there is an answer we can purchase to protect against invisible enemy that causes disease and death.

But are vaccines actually doing more harm than good?

Are vaccines actually slowly poisoning and weakening the population of our world?

Has a billion dollar industry covered up the truth and do your public officials cater to those big money powers?


Vaccines often contain mercury commonly in the form of Thimerosal, a mercury-based preservative that breaks down to ethylmercury and thiosalicylate in the body.

Some people spread false information that ethylmercury is not harmful like methylmercury and leaves the body in 7 to 10 days. Like much of the pro-vaccination rhetoric this is also false. The test did make reference to ethylmercury leaving the "blood" with a half life of 6.9 days but also tested for inorganic mercury distributed in other tissue and remaining in the brain.

While a study testing injected monkeys has stated that in the "thimerosal group, the half-life of total mercury in blood was 6.9 days, compared to 19.1 days for the methylmercury group" they went on to state that "the proportion of inorganic mercury in the brain was much higher in the thimerosal group (21–86% of total mercury) compared to the methylmercury group (6–10%). Brain concentrations of inorganic mercury were approximately twice as high in the thimerosal group compared to the methylmercury group. Inorganic mercury remains in the brain much longer than organic mercury, with an estimated half-life of more than a year."[27] They also admitted that "It’s not currently known whether inorganic mercury presents any risk to the developing brain."[27]

The study further "caution that risk assessments for thimerosal based on studies using blood mercury measurements may not be valid"[27] and emphasized "the risks associated with low-level exposures to inorganic mercury in the developing brain are unknown, and they describe other research linking persistent inorganic mercury exposure with increased activation of microglia in the brain, an effect recently reported in children with autism."[27]

Regular vaccines such as flu shots may increase the amount of ethylmercury in the blood and brain. A study, A Cross-Sectional Study of Blood Ethylmercury Levels and Cognitive Decline Among Older Adults and the Elderly in the United States, " supports the hypothesis that increased ethyl-Hg exposure is associated with significant cognitive decline in older adult and elderly Americans."

See also a Research Article

Thimerosal-Derived Ethylmercury Is a Mitochondrial Toxin in Human Astrocytes: Possible Role of Fenton Chemistry in the Oxidation and Breakage of mtDNA

"The results of this study suggest that ethylmercury is a mitochondrial toxin in human astrocytes. We believe that this finding is important, particularly since the number of diseases in which mitochondrial dysfunction has been implicated are rapidly increasing."

Silent Epidemic

Published on Oct 3, 2013

Silent Epidemic, by award-winning film director Gary Null, is the first documentary to investigate thoroughly the true medical record and the historical evidence about vaccine marvels. Conventional medicine has heralded the invention of vaccines as a miracle of modern science. It claims that vaccines have been proven to prevent and eradicate infectious diseases. We are told that vaccines are safe and effective, and that "herd immunity" can be achieved if a high percentage of a population is vaccinated. However, does the science support these claims and what are the untold consequences?

Psalms 58:3 The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies. Their poison is like the poison of a serpent: they are like the deaf adder that stoppeth her ear;

The Vaccine Hoax is Over

Published 29Sep2012 By coto2admin

Freedom of Information Act in the UK filed by a doctor there has revealed 30 years of secret official documents showing that government experts have:

1. Known the vaccines don’t work

2. Known they cause the diseases they are supposed to prevent

3. Known they are a hazard to children

4. Colluded to lie to the public

5. Worked to prevent safety studies

Those are the same vaccines that are mandated to children in the US.

Vaccines are the worst medical travesty that has ever been visited upon the human race.

These greedy profit mongers have preyed upon the love parents have for their children and upon the fear that the industry has actually created.

They have picked on the most vulnerable among us, first our babies and children and more recently, our mothers and fathers.

They have stolen their minds, compromised their health and shortened their lives.

They have bought off politicians who have made laws "mandating" vaccines to guarantee their profits.

They have stolen your tax dollars to donate to the industry for "researching" more poison to inject into the arms of an unsuspecting public.

When will people at least look at the information, stop believing the lies and stop the insanity of vaccines?

Those are the same vaccines that are mandated to children in the US. for more, look here:

The vaccine hoax is over by Andrew baker

Amish Anomaly

This picture was presented as proof that Amish get vaccines which no one is denying. These are not Amish but Mennonite. They are not infant but much older children and they are only being offered the MMR not a dozen or more vaccines. There had been a measles outbreak which came back from the missions. This picture is actually proof the soup of vaccination of infants is not nearly as common among these communities as it is in the private sectors. Listen to the videos and do your own research.

The term Amish anomaly was coined by Dan Olmsted, who asserted that he could only find three Amish autistics after searching in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania and that two of them were vaccinated. Olmsted had quoted Dr. Frank Noonan as saying, "You'll find all the other stuff, but we don't find the autism. We're right in the heart of Amish country and seeing none, and that's just the way it is."

There is a great effort to discredit the Amish anomaly which has clear statistical evidence that the less vaccines a group gets the less likely there is to be less occurrences of autism. The statistics clearly demonstrate that.

CDC Whistle Blower admits MMR Vaccine causes Autism Time 6:51

Immediately people will try to discredit anyone that brings vaccine safety or effectiveness into question. Instead of looking at alarming statistics with concerns many jumped to contradict these observations with the fact that there are Amish who vaccinate their children.

Some Amish do vaccinate their children but at a far less rate than the general public and many not at all. The paper used by some to prove this shows that Amish had lower rate of vaccinations because only a small percentage had "one child" vaccinated with "one vaccination".

And the sampling was only about one third of those contacted because the Amish who do not vaccinate would not fill out the paper being very private people and fearing persecution.

I know Amish people all over the country and that is they way it works. Vaccinations among some Amish is almost non existent. They are not all the same and the ones who are very against vaccinations don't tell strangers.

Many of the scientific studies are also playing with words and are funded by companies making huge profits from vaccinations.

"In March 2006, Drs. Kevin Strauss, Holmes Morton and others documented 9 autistic Amish children, which could raise the autism rate of the Lancaster Amish community Olmsted supposedly investigated to almost 1/5,000 which is still a fraction of the US average of 1/68." Strauss, K. A.; Puffenberger, E. G.; Huentelman, M. J.; Gottlieb, S.; Dobrin, S. E.; Parod, J. M.; Stephan, D. A.; Morton, D. H. (2006). "Recessive Symptomatic Focal Epilepsy and Mutant Contactin-Associated Protein-like 2". New England Journal of Medicine. 354 (13): 1370–1377. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa052773. PMID 16571880.

That is an alarming spread but it does not show cause. Statistics do not show "cause" in the relationship but statistics never show cause. That is not what statistics do.

But it should motivate grave concerns and compassionate from humble and unbiased people. Show me one pharmaceutical company that is going to shell out the money for a study that is going to cut into their billion-dollar profits.

Viral interference

"It is well known that infection of an organism, whether plant, animal, or bacterium, with a virus can prevent or partially inhibit infection with another virus within the same host, resulting in viral interference."[28]

"Viral interference is a phenomenon for which a cell infected by a virus becomes resistant toward a second outcoming infection by a superinfectant virus. Even though other mechanisms are known, it can be assumed that most cases of viral interference occurring in natural conditions are mediated by interferon, a low molecular weight protein produced by the infected cell in response to a stimulus provided by viral nucleic acid(s). The interferon produced by a cell can migrate to other cells not yet involved by the spreading infection, transmitting to them the antiviral-resistant state." [29]

This internal human process can bring a natural benefit from being exposed to different viruses both for the individual and the whole society. It lends to the natural process of obtaining herd immunity.

There also may be a downside if a temporary immunity is provided through vaccinations, like the annual flu vaccine. "Receiving influenza vaccination may increase the risk of other respiratory viruses, a phenomenon known as virus interference."[30]

"Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus and human metapneumovirus; however, significant protection with vaccination was associated not only with most influenza viruses, but also parainfluenza, RSV, and non-influenza virus coinfections."[31]

The Viral interference phenomenon which displays that flu vaccinated populations may be at greater risk from a respiratory disease than unvaccinated individuals is still controversial. There was also a small randomized trial of influenza vaccination in Hong Kong did report a significant increase risk of other respiratory viruses among recipients of influenza vaccination.[32]

“Vaccine” (a peer-reviewed medical journal) revealed that flu vaccines may increase the risk of infection from other respiratory viruses (including coronavirus), which is a phenomenon known as “virus interference". Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus.

It is estimated that 5% to 20% of the population get one of many strains of flu each year and show symptoms strong enough to realize that they have the flu and up to 200,000 are hospitalized from flu complications, with about 36,000 dying from those complications annually.
Others get the flu and show no symptoms (asymptomatic) or their symptoms are so mild that they do not know that they were infected by a virus. For others, the symptoms could be so moderate that the individual never goes and gets diagnosed.
We do not know how many people get the flu with no symptoms and receive a lifetime of immunity.
But, we know that 95% of the people who contracted the Poliovirus never showed symptoms or they were so mild they never knew that it was polio yet became immune.[33]

Coronavirus pandemic or just panic?

The current gamble seems to be to shut down the nation indefinitely to suppress a virus that is supposed to be especially deadly to some demographics and experts agree cannot be contained, only slowed.

By the Ides of March, 2020 "More than 99% of Italy’s coronavirus fatalities were people who suffered from previous medical conditions, according to the country’s national health authority.”  

Average age of those that died are in their 80's and more than half of the victims suffered from at least three prior illnesses. More than 75% had high blood pressure, about 35% had diabetes and a third suffered from heart disease. 300,000 people die every year from obesity. 647,000 Americans die from heart disease each year.

People seem to want to believe that if we merely quarantine sick people and those at risk, a “mitigation” strategy being used in Denmark, one computer model projects the U.S. death toll at about 2 million, again half from lack of ventilators, not depth of disease. But, the Hoover Institution's study and model, suggests “the total number of cases worldwide will peak out at well under one million, with the total number of deaths at under 50,000″ which is near the annual death rate due to flu in the United States.

So, what is the truth?

The number of 17 to 25 million people making medical visits is certainly not the number of cases because most people do not rush to the doctor when they get the flu. The estimate of 38 to 54 million cases is based on those who will show symptoms of the flu and those who go to the doctor.
Coronavirus confirmed cases as of March 25 were 64,765 with 910 deaths (Death rate of 1.4%).
Since we know that half the people who get this Covid 19 flu show no symptoms and the half that do show symptoms only have mild to moderate symptoms, the true number of cases of people who have already had this flu and are now immune is likely more than the most conservative number of at least 129,000 people in America (Death rate .7%).
Until they can actually test for the RNA of the virus or better the antigens[34] or antibodies[35] that show you are now immune there is no way to actually know those already immune or if the numbers have already reached herd immunity. It is very possible a million people have already been exposed which would bring the death rate down to .09% or lower. The sharp drop of new cases in China with over a billion people is evidence this may be occurring.
Delaying herd immunity is not good but destroying the economic stability of millions of families may be worse.

Why the CDC does not accurately factor that into their estimates only they can explain. We know that 95% of the people who contracted Poliovirus never showed symptoms so most people did not need the vaccination when it came out because they were already immune.

Audio Podcast

Other links mentioned in the recording include Christian conflict | Herd immunity | Vaccines | Pure Religion | covetous practices | Merchandise | curse children | Socialism | "Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus.

Download Recording 1

Download Recording 2

Download Recording 3

John P.A. Ioannidis, a professor of medicine, epidemiology, and statistics at Stanford University and co-director of Stanford’s Meta-Research Innovation Center.

"If we assume that case fatality rate among individuals infected by SARS-CoV-2 is 0.3% in the general population — a mid-range guess from the Diamond Princess analysis — and that 1% of the U.S. population gets infected (about 3.3 million people), this would translate to about 10,000 deaths."

News from the Princess

Professor John Ioannidis's data might allow an estimated of a .3% death rate which contradicts Epidemiologist Neil Ferguson's data which everyone has been pushed to accept as gospel. But many of the studies admit there are data limitations.

On the Diamond Princess cruise ship their laboratory tests were primarily PCR tests[36] that were "conducted focusing on symptomatic cases especially at the early phase of the quarantine. If asymptomatic cases were missed as a result of this, it would mean we have underestimated the asymptomatic proportion."[37]

There is a huge difference between calculating death rates using "case" numbers verses "estimate" numbers of a disease. You cannot compare the two without misleading people. If you are a professional and you do then you are lying. "As of February 20, tests of most of the 3,711 people aboard the Diamond Princess confirmed that 634, or 17 percent, had the virus; 328 of them did not have symptoms at the time of diagnosis. Of those with symptoms, the fatality ratio was 1.9 percent, Russell and colleagues calculate. Of all infected, that ratio was 0.91 percent. Those 70 and older were most vulnerable, with an overall fatality ratio of about 7.3 percent."[38] But if you calculate the death rate of the Covid-19 based on actual infections even amongst a population of people over 60 who are the most vulnerable that makes the death rate "in the real world, about 0.5 percent of COVID-19".[38]

The passengers and crew of the Diamond Princes were not a random sample but the passengers were mostly over 60, which may "lead to underestimation"[37] of the natural true asymptomatic portion of society. Even with the high age factor the death rate onboard was only 0.5 percent or less. If anyone factored in that everyone under 40 including small children have generally produced a percentage of .2% The death rate comes closer to the estimate of Professor John Ioannidis.

We cannot forget those pre-existing conditions that account for the vast majority of cases that show symptoms are found generally in the older population.

So, it is reasonable, considering the track record of COVID-19, that the presence of symptoms "may correlate with other factors unrelated to age including prior health conditions such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and/or immunosuppression."[37]

Reports from the Diamond Princess cruise ship should make it clear that the virus is highly contagious[39] under ship conditions but we also know that many people, though they get the virus, show little or no symptoms. A "substantial fraction of SARS-CoV-2 infected individuals are asymptomatic"[37] which had also been verified with higher numbers in a Japanese study.

Silent Cure

Anywhere from 80 percent of infections in adults to 95 percent of infections in children that are observed or detected appear to be mild to moderate cases overcome in about two weeks with rest at home. Since death rates are calculated only from those who get severely ill and are tested, we can assume the death rate from this virus is actually much lower. If we take in the high rate of asymptomatic individuals that we see in the Princess analysis and other broader examinations no one knows how many people or the rate they are being infected but recovering. That would infer that no one knows the actual death rate which seems far lower than some of the models.

As fast as it is spreading, we can assume that society is well on its way to "herd immunity" which is the best way to reach maximum protection of society. A vaccine cannot accomplish that and a quarantine of society only delays the natural process of the society obtaining herd immunity.

So many people have likely been exposed and recovered and are now immune. Why are we risking a wrecked economy and welfare expansions beyond FDR’s wildest dreams?

Richard Epstein at the Hoover Institution writes of serious flaws in predictions of 1 million or more Americans dead from coronavirus:

  • “Clearly, the impact on elderly and immunocompromised individuals is severe, with nearly 90% of total deaths coming from individuals 60 and over. But these data do not call for shutting down all public and private facilities given the extraordinarily low rates of death in the population under 50.”
  • “Of course, every life lost is a tragedy…but those deaths stemming from the coronavirus are not more tragic than others, so that the same social calculus applies here that should apply in other cases... A Depression Will Ruin 330 Million Lives, Not 4 Million”

Victor Davis Hanson was a professor of classics at California State University, Fresno, and is currently the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution. He has been a visiting professor at Hillsdale College since 2004. He suggests that:

“[T]he massive curtailments of the U.S. economy can have as many health consequences as the virus itself—if millions lose income and jobs, become depressed in self-isolation, increase smoking, and drug and alcohol use, and postpone out of fear necessary buying and visits to doctors and hospitals for chronic and serious medical conditions unrelated to the virus...”


By March 26 after the world economy has almost entirely shut down, millions of people ending up unemployed, hundreds of thousands of people losing their business and suffering hardships, an increase in suicides, the list goes on. But now Epidemiologist Neil Ferguson is downgrading his original estimates for many of the same reasons we have already shared on our network. He reduced the number of expected deaths from 2.2 million people in the United States and 500,000 in the U.K. to a fraction of what he originally predicted. Now, this expert epidemiologist tells the British government that hospitals will be just fine taking on COVID-19 patients and he estimates "20,000 or far fewer people will die" from the virus itself or from its agitation of other ailments, as reported by New Scientist the day before.

From the beginning, hundreds of epidemiologists and doctors were saying this flu, while more contagious,[39] would not reach Ferguson's frightening numbers. And many published prediction models have been far closer to the truth. But they were not invited into the media so most people have only heard the hype. Their low number predictions are coming true while Ferguson backpedals. But the damage is done.

What can we learn?

Ferguson would eventually backtrack on his downgraded prediction saying that the new numbers are only the result of social spacing and the shutdown. This, of course, contradicts what he said about the numbers revealing that far more people likely have the virus than his team figured.

When Ferguson lowered his estimates to a fraction of the original panicking numbers, he stated, “What we’ve been seeing, though, in Europe in the last week or two is a rate of growth of the epidemic which was faster than we expected from early data in China. And so we are revising our quotes... we should have been looking at previously.”

The "early data in China" did not factor in the mild symptoms or the numerous asymptotic people that included more than half of the passengers on the cruise ship, the Diamond Princess, nor have they considered the millions of people with symptoms so mild or moderate they never thought they had this particular flu.

Gupta on the Silent Cure

Professor Sanjay Gupta with a research team at Oxford study suggests that the virus had been invisibly spreading for at least a month earlier than suspected, concluding that as many as half of the people in the United Kingdom have already been infected by COVID-19.

No one is ending this virus. It will still be around when people are let out again.

Remember they said these drastic measures were just to "slow" the spread of the virus.

Experts warned us that slowing the virus could be dangerous but for some reason they chose to cripple the economy. Why?

They kept telling us this was a "novel" virus and no one is immune. What they did not tell you is there are new viruses every year and have been for decades and centuries. Yet, we become immune, or enough us do to protect society. Our bodies do so naturally if we let it.

The case of the missing estimate

Many people are beginning to do the math and some journalist are saying we are being lied to.

Clive Cookson, Science Editor MARCH 24 2020 announced in his story "Coronavirus may have infected half of UK population — Oxford study "where he reveals that a "New epidemiological model suggests the vast majority of people suffer little or no illness."[40] Herd immunity equates to anything over 60%.

The UK population is over 67,530,172 and halving that suggests 33,765,086 people already have or have had the virus.

After Oxford announced on March 17th they believd more than half of the UK alread had the virus only there were only 14,543 cases that had been been counted with deaths numbering at 759.

That would make the actual death rate only 0.00002% for 33,765,086 million people who had mild cases an possibly showed little or even zero symptoms.

Of course, more deaths will come as those who are seriously ill may succumb. We can now see 15 days later the numbers changed.

United Kingdom had 38,868 confirmed cases on April 3.

But of course the actual number of people who have contracted COVID 19 has also been increasing too over the 33,700,000 estimated by Oxford scholars.

The officials source tells us that 208 serously ill patients have recovered. But that is deceptive because according to Oxford scientist who have been testing for the actual antibodies a clearer picture is provided to the public when they are also told that more than 33,700,000 people have recovered with their own antibodies protecting them from getting ill or spreading the virus.

At the same time the number of deaths has reached 3,611. Using that number from April 3 and Oxford estimate from March 17th for estimated cases of COVID 19 the death rate still calculates out to 0.0001. The average death rate for the annual seasonal flu is 0.1.

So, we all need to ask the question why has almost the whole world economy been shut down shutdown?

We also may want to ask rather than devastate the lives and the personal economies of millions of Americans and plunging the nation into trillions and trillions of dollars in debt was there something more practicle to do?

Wouldn't it have been simpler to quarantine the people who are most vulnerable? You could have put them all in those private motels we have shutdown and brought them room service from all those restaurants we closed. That all could have been done for a fraction of the cost.

If you ponder the facts rather than run behind the media narrative you might be ready to ask more questions. Like is this corruption, conspiracy, or incompitance? Or is their more going on than we know?

The Oxford study

The Oxford study that shows that half the people in the UK may already be immune has been referenced in the news.[41]

The Oxford study contradicts the Imperial College London model used by the UK government to develop policies to halt the crisis using social distancing.

  • “I am surprised that there has been such unqualified acceptance of the Imperial model,” Sunetra Gupta, professor of theoretical epidemiology, who led the study, told the Financial Times.[42]

Has Britain been allowing the virus to spread, while other countries have closed schools and implemented more drastic measures? The government is trying to build up herd immunity to combat the infection. Oxford and London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) are said to agree with the British approach.[43]

This massive but silent spread of immunity in the UK has certainly been going on in America too. They tell us to listen to the experts and then they only let you hear from the ones they want.

This "Silent Cure" has been taking society toward the ultimate goal of reaching the safety of herd immunity as nature has done throughout the history of mankind.

For weeks we have been informing people on our network and those who listen to our Podcasts details based on all the reports that were coming out before the government began to shut down the economic lives of the people and the media began to panic the lemmings of society.

So have the governments of the world failed to listen to all the expert analysts that were giving drastically different numbers? Has the media struck fear into the people to cause panic? Is their more to these events than what the people have been told? Did some people seize the opportunity to use this virus to cover the movement of trillions of dollars, the expansion of government powers, the doubling of the national debt, and to test the people's resistance to martial law? Are they done? Or is their more to come?

"You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." ~Rahm Emanuel

Delaying herd immunity

Should we be delaying herd immunity by the drastic economic shutdown being imposed by the government?

“Graham Medley from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, who chairs a group of scientists who model the spread of infectious diseases and advise the government on pandemic responses, says that the actual goal is the same as that of other countries: flatten the curve by staggering the onset of infections. As a consequence, the nation may achieve herd immunity; it's a side effect, not an aim.”[44]

But according to Thomas House, “The current coronavirus outbreak (COVID-19 [2020-03-14 ]) has raised questions about herd immunity, social distancing measures, and the relationship between these.” “In fact, the later intervention dramatically reduces the burden on the healthcare system, cutting in half the maximum numbers ill and potentially needing treatment at any one time, and significantly reduces the final number infected, which the earlier interventions fail to do.”

“The reason that this happens is that social distancing measures do not lead to herd immunity, so once they are lifted the epidemic starts again.”[45]

There is a need to develop herd immunity rather than shutting down the economic livelihood of society at the devastation of millions of families and cursing our children with eternal debt.

  • "We think this virus is likely to be one that comes year on year ... like a seasonal virus ... Communities will become immune to it and that's going to be an important part of controlling this longer term." Sir Patrick Vallance, Chief scientific adviser.

Antibodies of the Coronavirus

In one interview with James Walsh, Pulitzer-winning infectious disease reporter Laurie Garrett explained the necessity of antibody tests:

  • "If we had this antibody test, we can go around randomly selecting people in New York City and find out how many New Yorkers, including right now, have had this virus in their bodies."[46]

Other experts are saying the same thing because they know that natural herd immunity is essential to good societal health:

  • "Johnson's chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, who along with chief medical officer Chris Whitty has been entrusted by the government to manage the spread of virus, says between 60 to 70 per cent of the population would need to be infected to achieve herd immunity." [47]

Vaccines generally only give temporary immunity. If more half the population of the UK is already immune there is little need for a vaccine and opening the economy can begin immediately. It also means all the projected numbers of vast hospitalization is completely bogus. The other 30 million Brits would only produce at the most 14,000 more cases with far less national deaths numbering at less than 1500 and not the 20,000 revised figure of Ferguson nor his outlandish original of 500,000.

The slow down of the spread of the virus may not be because of the shutdown and social spacing but the fact that the people are reaching herd immunity. Remember Correlation is not Causation.

The only way to know for sure is to begin to randomly testing the populations for antibodies of the Coronavirus.[48]

Professor Trudie Lang, of the Global Health Network at the University of Oxford, said that the latest test for COVID-19 works by detecting the vital antibodies which “will demonstrate if your immune system has cleared the infection...It’s very unlikely you can get the virus again.” [49]

Other countries are working on tests for antibodies. We know that the PCR or RT-PCR test[36] is inaccurate by itself for identifying a specific virus or those infected.

Numerous teams in numerous countries have developed the equipment for a test for the Coronavirus and the Antibodies of the Coronavirus in early March and have already been testing in Oxford, UK, and Mt. Sinai Queens Hospital in New York. They can test a patient with results in six minutes. If people in the governments of the world care about the people and the economy by which they sustain their "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" they will make an antibody test the priority.

There will be a drawback to this commonsense approach. If it is discovered that 60 to 70 percent of the people are immune already or quickly approaching that herd immunity, as Oxfordand LSE agree, then a vaccine will not be as important or needed. This means millions of dollars will not be made by pharmaceutical companies, nor will they be able to claim credit for saving the people when in fact the people already saved themselves because of their robust immune systems. Pharmaceutical companies and developers of vaccines have no interest and certainly no financial incentive in finding out that society is again becoming immune without them.

The Test

David Crowe, an expert in global infections such as SARS, Ebola, and flu, sees the coronavirus panic as an irrational panic, based on an unproven RNA test called “polymerase chain reaction” (PCR).[36]

  • "The coronavirus test is based on PCR,[36] a manufacturing technique. When used as a test, it does not produce a positive/negative [actually this would be better described as "presence or absence" of the amplified gene product] result, but simply the number of cycles required to detect genetic material. The division between positive and negative is an arbitrary number of cycles chosen by the testers. If positive means infected and negative means uninfected, then there are cases of people going from infected to uninfected and back to infected again in a couple of days."
  • "The world is suffering from a massive delusion based on the belief that a test for RNA is a test for a deadly new virus... but that is not proof that the RNA is from a virus. Without purification and characterization of virus particles, it cannot be accepted that an RNA test is proof that a virus is present."

A new scientific paper (citation) has calculated the false positive rate with the PCR Test[36] for asymptomatic patients at 80%! The data is little more than a guess and the statics tell you nothing since so many people without symptoms or mild cases are never even tested with any test nor counted when estimating death rates.

Everyone wants to believe testing settles the issue as to being infected or not. An accurate dependable test that is virus-specific is still in development. Without purification and characterization of virus particles of the RNA there is no proof that a virus is present. The common PCR[36] test (polymerase chain reaction) gives many false positives and is not RNA specific. If you're sick stay home, avoid contact, treat as most flu infection or call your health provider.

Political Backpedaling

Governor Cuomo is backtracking on the shutdown policy with his statement, “If you rethought that or had time to analyze that public health strategy, I don’t know that you would say quarantine everyone. I don’t even know that that was the best public health policy."[50]

Why is Cuomo changing his mind? Does he have information that is not yet released the public? Could this change of heart be because of new testing in New York, Oxford, and some locations in Europe? Because they can now test for the antibodies of the Coronavirus will we finally reveal the extent and truth about this professed pandemic?

They asked the question in Science magazine, "How many COVID-19 cases have gone undetected? And are those who had mild cases of the disease—perhaps so mild they dismissed it as a cold or allergies—immune to new infections? If so, they could slow the spread of the burgeoning pandemic."[51]

This new testing being used can identify the DNA of the virus and answer these question which the common PCR test (polymerase chain reaction), which is an RNA-based diagnostic test,[36] cannot answer. This new equipment can test a person’s blood for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2[52]. Such tests can detect active infections, too, but more importantly, they can tell whether a person has been infected in the past because the body retains antibodies against pathogens it has already overcome.

Mt. Sinai Queens Hospital

That is right. The ability to actually make these virus-specific tests was not available until the mid-March announcement. They certainly had to test the equipment locally where, "An expert team of researchers and clinicians in microbiology, virology, pathology, molecular science, and immunology at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (ISMMS) and The Mount Sinai Hospital (MSH) have been working together around the clock to design, validate, and implement an “end-to-end” clinical pathology laboratory solution that will allow for the testing of approximately several hundred people per day in order to rapidly diagnose and help guide the selection of treatment and monitor disease course."[53]

During the validation process they had to be testing both ill patients and healthy people to determine if their new procedures were effective just like was being done in the UK with the Oxford study team.

Reading the article and seeing the fact that they have been secretly testing already, could it be that they are already confirming Oxford study's projection that more than half of the UK is already immune and well on their way to herd immunity? Are they getting similar numbers testing American?

The article quoting Cuomo's shrouded confession talks about "other pieces of evidence", and "the number of people who are infected" being "much larger" "with few exceptions around the world":

  • "At the same time, we have other pieces of evidence that the number of people who are infected is much larger compared with the number of cases we have documented. In most places, with few exceptions around the world, we are just testing people who have substantial symptoms who have come to seek health care or even to be hospitalized. These are just the tip of the iceberg."[50]

Cuomo went on to say the following:

  • “Young people then quarantined with older people was probably not the best public health strategy because the younger people could have been exposing the older people to an infection."[50]

Cuomo at this point knows that people, especially young people, can have the virus with no symptoms. Of course, we have been saying this for months which was confirmed by the earliest analysis from the Diamond Princess cruise.

Cuomo further stated that:

  • “What we did was we closed everything down. That was our public health strategy. Just close everything, all businesses, old workers, young people, old people, short people, tall people. Every school closed, everything.”[50]

The well-written article, worth reading entirely, written by Jeffrey A. Tucker also states, "It’s true that anyone following the unfolding fiasco and the gradually emerging data behind it knows that Cuomo is right. The response has not been modern and scientific. It has been medieval and mystical. The theory behind the policy has been nothing but a panicked cry of run and hide before the noxious gas gets you. Lacking reliable data – which is the fault of the CDC and FDA – we replaced knowledge with power."[50]

I agree entirely with Jeffrey except for the part about "fault". Blame is not like pie. You do not divide it up in shares. The CDC, FDA, CNN, ABC, Fox and all the media carry their burden of personal blame from 100% of their own lack of perception, integrity, due diligence, and honesty. Every politician and their incompetent advisors must also carry the blame in what has become a fiasco of foolish panic.

But most of all in the government of the people, by the people, and for the people, the people must take their own blame. They have given the power to their government leaders, to the talking heads of the media and to the puppet masters behind them. They have also given power to men in white coats, and letters after their names. They gave power to men with labels like "expert" paraded by the media across the screens of their electronic devices.

Now as it has been revealed that they ate the cheese and accepted the fake news that the sky was falling, and a plague was going to kill us all when the truth was available to journalists, advisors, politicians and even the people if they had the honesty, fortitude, industry, and spirit to pursue the truth. But isn't that pursuit included in the command to seek the kingdom of God and His righteousness?

If the evidence Cuomo speaks of and suggested by the teams atMt. Sinai Queens Hospital, Oxford study, and other research teams around the world is shared with the people some will begin to realize that society can become immune to new diseases naturally through herd immunity. They may also realize that they should stop putting too much "faith" and "power in the hands of the government and the media.

There are elements of society that would like to keep this information from the people because with the people's ignorance and apathy men are allowed to seek power.

Cuomo says he cannot believe the president just extended the quarantine that shortly before Cuomo thought was a good idea.

  • “I don’t believe that he could be serious, that any federal administration could be serious about a physical lockdown of states or parts of states across this country,” Cuomo continued. “I don’t believe it is legal. I think it would be economic chaos. I don’t think the American people would stand for it. It’s just a question of time before you see the numbers growing in hot spots across the nation. So, I think it makes absolutely no sense and I don’t believe any serious governmental personality or professional would support it.”[54]

Even though Cuomo and everyone else were saying a few weeks ago shut it down now he is criticizing Trump for extending the quarantine, even threatening to sue President.

  • “I’ve sued the federal government many times by the way over the past few years, we’ve had quite a number of policy decisions,”[54]

Again, why was he so adamant about shutting everything down and now thinks it makes "no sense"?

  • "So, I think it makes absolutely no sense and I don’t believe any serious governmental personality or professional would support it.” [54]

Is Cuomo sharing Mt Sinai's new evidence and test results from Mt Sinai with the president and his advisors or is he baiting the president as a political rival?

  • “Look, if the president was considering this, I guarantee he would have called me. I mean, we talk about relatively trivial matters when it comes to dealing with this situation,” Cuomo said. This is a civil war kind of — this is civil war kind of discussion.”[54]

I do not care about their politics, only the truth because the truth, whatever it is, will set you free.

Where is wisdom

Why are so many willing to plunge the nation, and even the world, into a depression that kills many businesses and shoves millions onto welfare for what could be the next several generations?

Banks are closing their doors, changing their rules, removing longstanding safeguards and controls. Cash is rejected out of fear because it might carry a virus while the "printing presses" are fired up ushering in a future of inflation and a virtually cashless society.

Millions more will be transformed from productive workers to bitter takers, causing a faster implosion of our already mathematically impossible welfare state. In the subsequent depression, many people may die due to poverty, and despair with suicide rates and crime rising even higher.

Courts can now delay your trial for a year or more and your day in court facing your accuser can be before a video camera.

People are quarantined in their home by media hype, misinformation, politicians who do not respect the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness of the individual but only their own power. They are so drunk[55] on the power and the vanity of their office they have become blind guides. People may claim to care about their personal loss of freedom but not the loss of their neighbors' liberty. They have given away their rights and power because of their own personal sloth in the love of righteousness and the avarice of the people in their personal desire for benefits and security.

The world has come to a place were doctors, bureaucrats and politicians casually talk about going house to house and taking out people who they say are infected and retaining them against their will under the guise of public safety. It seems to have worked so well to shut down the business, jobs, and livelihoods of the people by the millions with words of fear.

I have heard men and women say they would choose to get sick and die rather than take away the livelihoods of their children and the future of their grandchildren but they are few and far between.

Most of the people, having grown accustomed to feeding at the expense of others and to depend for their livelihood on the property of others are more than willing to institute the rule of violence. This, of course, is because they have had an appetite for benefits and the habit of receiving them by way of a rule of force and violence through the power of men who exercise authority one over the other.

Christ preached the opposite of those covetous practices and condemned the Corban of the Pharisees. This means that there is significant blame that can be placed on the modern Church which has failed and even refused to preach the whole Gospel of the kingdom. They have replaced the way of faith, hope and charity with the fealty, fear, and force. They have abandoned the daily ministration of righteousness and love offered by the early Church who rightly divided bread from house to house for the wages of unrighteousness offered by the welfare state and became workers of iniquity getting the people to believe a lie for they have become the false prophet of the beast.[56]

I do not know how this will all end but I know those who are willing to drink the blood of their neighbor or to take a bite of their neighbor will come to poverty.[57]

The flesh and blood of Christ is a product of charity and love while the sacrifices of the world which provide their free bread make you merchandise and curse children.[58]

  • "Awake, awake, stand up, O Jerusalem, which hast drunk at the hand of the LORD the cup of his fury; thou hast drunken the dregs of the cup of trembling, and wrung them out." Isaiah 51:17

Comparitive Lies

UK’s Boris Johnson claimed to be ‘Furious’ With China’s Coronavirus ‘Disinformation Campaign’[59] but what of the disinformation coming to the people through the government and promoted by the media. Boris went on to pledge a day of “reckoning”. But what of the disinformation right before us if we have eyes to see and ears to hear. It has been steadily fed to the people by governments and the media. Disinformation is a politically polite word for misinformation or more precisely a lie.s. Certainly, there will be a day of reckoning for those who are to blame for lies.

TRUTH: Seasonal FLU TWICE as Deadly as Coronavirus?Take a look at the numbers from the W.H.O. and in an “apples to apples” comparison, the Coronavirus has HALF the mortality rate of the seasonal flu when it comes to "death to confirmed cases" ratio. Time 11:58

The annual flu, according to the numbers, appears to be twice as deadly as the Covid-19. The death rate for the annual seasonal flu[60] is 0.1% but available numbers available to the government bring the Death rate for Covid-19 is from 0.09% to as low as 0.002%.

This is because of the use of "confirmed" numbers, often labeled as "Cases", to calculate the Covid-19 death rate is going to give you a different percent than if you use the total "estimated" numbers.

The video by Ben Swann shows the WHO, the CDC, journalists, and politicians been comparing "confirmed" numbers or "Cases" to the "estimated" numbers giving an incorrect comparison and advancing the idea that Covid-19 is more dangerous or deadly than the actual seasonal flu and causing a panic amongst people through an incompetent media void of responsible journalism.

Estimated numbers are available although they may vary because they are estimates. But we know from the Diamond Princes analysis that even among people over 60 there was a large number of cases that were moderate to mild and even asymptomatic of COVID-19. As we have shown earlier in our analysis of the Diamond Princes cruise data:

There is a huge difference between calculating death rates using "case" numbers verses "estimate" numbers of a disease. You cannot compare the two without misleading people. If you are a professional and you do then you are lying. "As of February 20, tests of most of the 3,711 people aboard the Diamond Princess confirmed that 634, or 17 percent, had the virus; 328 of them did not have symptoms at the time of diagnosis. Of those with symptoms, the fatality ratio was 1.9 percent, Russell and colleagues calculate. Of all infected, that ratio was 0.91 percent. Those 70 and older were most vulnerable, with an overall fatality ratio of about 7.3 percent."[38] But if you calculate the death rate of the Covid-19 based on actual infections even amongst a population of people over 60 who are the most vulnerable that makes the death rate "in the real world, about 0.5 percent of COVID-19".[38]

Many hospitals also developed a policy of accepting and testing only severe cases and testing only those who were suffering difficulty breathing. That policy would also drive up the number of cases to deaths ratio and percent.

We were constantly being told that that COVID-19 was an unprecedented life-threatening virus to the whole of society when in fact it appears that it was the quite the opposite. Many of the facts were available if we looked closely and the truth was attainable as a simple grade-school math problem.

But the media worked its magic on the minds of the people who through the power of fear and suggestion fell pray to the Lemming Effect and mass hysteria. This allowed the governments of the world to lock down the people of the planet with little or no resistance and crash the personal economy of workers and small businesses by the billions.

We know CEO's and people in the know like Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos sold off huge blocks of stocks shortly before this all began reaping huge profits with more to come.

We also know that members of the US legislature sold off millions of dollars in stocks shortly before the shutdown and the subsequent stock market crash. They and their friend are positioned to make more profit if they start buying just before the governments choose to turn the economy back on. Meanwhile, the people suffer and are drained of their own resources in one of the largest wealth transfer in history.

This has all been made possible by the irresponsible acts of the health institutions who should have known better than throughout to the public skewed numbers and false comparisons of the available data they are paid to analyze. There is certainly plenty of blame to be placed directly on the shoulders of the media who published and promoted this false erroneous narrative. Their relentless repetition has demonstrated the most incompetent journalism of this century and probably the last. And then there are the politicians, those who sought private profit, those who voted themselves a raise while taking away the right of the people to their own lives, liberty, and pursuit of happiness.

Instead of letting the people make their own choices as to how best to quarantine themselves when necessary or deal with the dangers and responsibility of providing for their own health and wellbeing they chose, with apparent impunity, to seize the lives and liberty of every American and squeeze. There, of course, is someone to blame for this tragic state of affairs, the people themselves.

But there is more because this has never really been about a flu virus but lies and why they were originally told.

What is going on

Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., lead members of the White House Coronavirus Task Force addressing the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic in the United States, evidently was aware that "If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%."[61] This is less of a threat than the annual flu and he knew it at least back in February. He was in a position to calm the panic but instead chose to promote it by encouraging lies to be spread in the media as truth. Why?

The Oxford study team in the UK and the medical team at Mt. Sinai Queens Hospital in New York have developed machines to test the blood of people and determine not only that they have the virus but if they have ever had it. It appears from the reports coming from their earliest testing and because people under 40 are far less symptomatic that the death rate of actual infections can be proven to be far less than 0.5 of seen on the Diamond Princes cruise ship but more like 0.05 or even far lower. But the shutdown continues and has been extended even though this information is readily available. Even now executive orders are being signed to call up additional troops. What is going on?

By March 27th the president to continue to expand the authority of the government which often diminishes the choices of the people[62] and even call up troops for the emergency.[63]


About the author


Dr. Mercola Interviews Dr. Andrew Wakefield on His MMR Study Natural health expert Dr. Joseph Mercola and Dr. Andrew Wakefield talks about autism, childhood vaccine safety, and his controversial MMR study. Time 1:25:12

Dr. Joseph Mercola and Dr. Andrew Wakefield

In February 1998, the Lancet published Dr. Andrew Wakefield's case series of a group of autistic children with gastric problems, which has become one of the most controversial studies in medicine because part of the patients' story included regression after receiving the MMR vaccine.
Dr Andrew Wakefield In His Own Words (full interview) admits MMR Vaccine causes Autism. Time 1:01:59
The debate is a heated one, as the study suggests there may be a link between the MMR vaccine, bowel disease and autism.
Dr. Wakefield, who has published over 140 original scientific papers, reviews, and book chapters, explained his findings in the paper, which has become one of the most misrepresented in medical history.[64]
Brian Deer, published accusations of falsified data and fraud which were subsequently shown to be false in the English High Court. All of Wakefield’s colleagues including Professor John Walker-Smith were reinstated and exonerated.[65]
Writing in the BMJ, research microbiologist David Lewis, of the National Whistleblowers Center, explains that he reviewed histopathological grading sheets by two of Dr. Wakefield's coauthors, pathologists Amar Dhillon and Andrew Anthony, and concluded there was no fraud committed by Dr. Wakefield:
  • "As a research microbiologist involved with the collection and examination of colonic biopsy samples, I do not believe that Dr. Wakefield intentionally misinterpreted the grading sheets as evidence of "non-specific colitis." Dhillon indicated "non-specific" in a box associated, in some cases, with other forms of colitis. In addition, if Anthony's grading sheets are similar to ones he completed for the Lancet article, they suggest that he diagnosed "colitis" in a number of the children."
In a press release, Lewis continued:
  • "The grading sheets and other evidence in Wakefield's files clearly show that it is unreasonable to conclude, based on a comparison of the histological records, that Andrew Wakefield 'faked' a link between the MMR vaccine and autism.
  • "Now that these records have seen the light of day, it is time for others to stop using them for this purpose as well. False allegations of research misconduct can destroy the careers of even the most accomplished and reputable scientists overnight. It may take years for them to prove their innocence; and even then the damages are often irreparable. In cases where mistakes are made, every effort should be taken to fully restore the reputations and careers of scientists who are falsely accused of research misconduct."

Says Wakefield concerning those who replicated his work:

“… it’s been replicated in Canada, in the U.S., in Venezuela, in Italy… [but] they never get mentioned. All you ever hear is that no one else has ever been able to replicate the findings.

I’m afraid that is false.”

Lancet did retract the Wakefield et al paper in February 2010, because some elements in the paper were contrary to the findings of the earlier investigation. This is a consistent practice with any peer-reviewed general medical journal. That does not mean the Wakefield paper was wrong but only that there is a need for more evidence and review to resolve conflicting data. The reasons for the retraction were subsequently shown to be false in the English High Court.

Lancet exonerated Wakefield and his colleagues from charges of ethical violations and scientific misconduct.

The Dr. Wakefield study has “been replicated in Canada, in the U.S., in Venezuela, in Italy" You can read a list of 28 studies from around the world that support Dr. Wakefield’s controversial findings with links to most of them here: see list of study and papers

Instead of a deep concern for vaccine safety and pressure on those who profit from their use to produce a safe vaccine we get law that give companies immunity.

Instead, we see whistle-blower and studies that bring the safety and efficacy of vaccines into question viciously attacked.

Healthier Children

"Studies Prove Without Doubt That Unvaccinated Children Are Far Healthier"

According to Christina England:

"A study from the 1990s has come to light, proving that compared to unvaccinated children, vaccinated children were more likely to suffer from asthma, eczema, ear infections, hyperactivity and many other chronic conditions. - See more:

More links:

30 Years of Secret Official Transcripts

Secret Official Transcripts Show UK Government Experts Cover Up Vaccine Hazards To Sell More Vaccines And Harm Your Kids Posted on March 14, 2012 by ChildHealthSafety

"An extraordinary new paper published by a courageous doctor and investigative medical researcher has dug the dirt on 30 years of secret official transcripts of meetings of UK government vaccine committees and the supposedly independent medical “experts” sitting on them with their drug industry connections.

If you want to get an idea of who is responsible for your child’s condition resulting from a vaccine adverse reaction then this is the paper to read."

Government experts cover up vaccine

Flu deaths False Scare Tactics

H1N1 flu shot.jpg

Bayer and Death: 1918 and Aspirin Posted on July 9, 2011 by geobear7 | 35 Comments Part 1 of 5

By J. Holcombe, D. Jacobson, and T. Ruhl What killed people during the Spanish Flu outbreak of 1918? It may not have been the flu at all???



What Docters say.

Should vaccines be mandatory? If you do not have a right to say "no" then it is not your body and you are not free. If you want to be free then you should repent and stop trying to take away the rights of others.


  1. Vaccination - The Silent Epidemic YouTube
  2. The Greater Good - Real Stories of Vaccine Injury Homepage YouTube Vimeo Amazon
  3. Truthstream News: About All Those Vaccines YouTube
  4. Vaccination: The Hidden Truth YouTube Vimeo
  5. Denmark Documentary on HPV Vaccine YouTube
  6. Vaccination - The Truth About Vaccines Homepage YouTube
  7. Lethal Injection YouTube
  8. Bought Homepage YouTube Vimeo
  9. Deadly Immunity YouTube Facebook
  10. Autism - Made in the USA YouTube
  11. Beyond Treason YouTube Amazon
  12. Trace Amounts YouTube Amazon
  13. We Don't Vaccinate YouTube - First 36 minsVimeo - First 36 mins Vimeo - Full
  14. Autism Yesterday Vimeo DVD
  15. Vaccine Nation YouTube Vimeo DVD
  16. Vaxxed Homepage Vimeo DVD
  17. Man Made Epidemic YouTube Vimeo
  18. 50 Cents A Dose Vimeo Father Interview YouTube Father Interview Vimeo
  19. Direct Order YouTube
  20. Dtap - Vaccine Roulette YouTube Facebook
  21. Shots In The Dark YouTube
  22. Hear The Silence YouTube Vimeo
  23. Cervical Cancer Vaccine – Is It Safe? YouTube Part 1 YouTube Part 2

Vaccines | Coronavirus | Polio Vaccine and Cancer |
Politics of Health | Just say no vaccines | Health_Share | Health

Mind | Mysteries of the Universe‏‎ | Spiritual DNA and Gene Expression |
Dendritic tree | Mysteries | Mystery Babylon | Meditation |
Cognitive dissonance | Bipolar | Capgras | Cotard | Trolls
Schizophrenia | Are you crazy | Autism | Depression |
Insane | Trauma | Narcissists | Repentance | Recovery |
Drugged | Vaccines | Health | Aid Addicts | Saul Syndrome |


There is no offer of any "effective treatment or cure." This information is based on personal experiences, what people have learned, as well as what is available on web sites. It is not meant or offered as medical advice or diagnosis and the information provided does not necessarily reflect the opinions of the owners of or the site itself, but is offered for educational purposes only.


  1. Natural Immunity VS. Artificial Immunity
  2. Stated in a paper written by Dr. Sheri Tenpenny The Polio Vaccine Myth: “The Vaccine Stopped Polio”Published February 18, 2012 By Joe Martino
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 "In 1977, Dr. Jonas Salk, who developed the first polio vaccine, testified along with other scientists that mass inoculation against polio was the cause of most polio cases throughout the USA since 1961. (Science 4/4/77 “Abstracts” )"
  4. 4.0 4.1 "In the Democratic Republic of the Congo, three different circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 (cVDPV2) outbreaks have been detected in acute flaccid paralysis (AFP) cases. In February 2018, the government declared cVDPV2 to be a national public health emergency." World Health Organization, Circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 – Democratic Republic of the Congo
  5. 5.0 5.1 "The route by which an antigen is administered frequently determines the type and duration of antibody response. For example, intramuscular injection of inactivated poliomyelitis virus (Salk vaccine) generates less production of serum antibody and induces only a temporary systemic immunity; it may not produce substantial local gastrointestinal immunity and, therefore, may not prevent the carrying of the virus in the gastrointestinal tract." Natural and acquired immunity
  6. Whooping cough immunity lasts longer than previously thought
  7. American Society for Microbiology (ASM)
  8. Krause RM. The origin of plagues: old and new, Science , 1992, vol. 257 (pg. 1073-8)
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 Naturally Acquired Immunity to Poliovirus: Historical Observations Have Been Ignored, Colin L. Crawford
  10. Harold Buttram, M.D., “Vaccine Scene 2000, Review and Update,” Medical Sentinel, Vol.5 No. 2, March/April 2000.
  13. Krause RM. The origin of plagues: old and new, Science, 1992, vol. 257 (pg. 1073-8)
  14. National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), 512 Maple Ave. W. #206, Vienna, VA 22180, 703-938-0342; "Investigative Report on the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System."
  15. 42 U.S.C.S. § 300aa-25(b)(1)(A),(B).
  16. Spalding JMK. Swash M, Oxbury J. Poliomyelitis, Clinical neurology , 1991EdinburghChurchill Livingstone(pg. 800-3)
  17. Hearings before the Committee on Interstate and Foreign Commerce, House of Representatives, 87th Congress, Second Session on H.R. 10541, May 1962, at 94.
  18. 18.0 18.1 The Polio Vaccine Myth: “The Vaccine Stopped Polio”Published February 18, 2012 By Joe Martino
  19. 1. Outbreak of Measles Among Persons With Prior Evidence of Immunity, New York City, 2011
    2. Detection of Measles Virus RNA in Urine Specimens from Vaccine Recipients
    3. Comparison of the Safety, Vaccine Virus Shedding and Immunogenicity of Influenza Virus Vaccine, Trivalent, Types A and B, Live Cold-Adapted, Administered to Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-Infected and Non-HIV Infected Adults
    4. Sibling Transmission of Vaccine-Derived Rotavirus (RotaTeq) Associated with Rotavirus Gastroenteritis
    5. Polio vaccination may continue after wild virus fades
    6. Engineering attenuated virus vaccines by controlling replication fidelity
    8. The Safety Profile of Varicella Vaccine: A 10-Year Review
    9. Comparison of Shedding Characteristics of Seasonal Influenza Virus (Sub)Types and Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09; Germany, 2007–2011
    10. Epigenetics of Host–Pathogen Interactions: The Road Ahead and the Road Behind
    11. Animal Models for Influenza Virus Pathogenesis and Transmission
    12. Acellular pertussis vaccines protect against disease but fail to prevent infection and transmission in a nonhuman primate mode
    13. Study Finds Parents Can Pass Whooping Cough to Babies
  20. : Immunized People Getting Whooping Cough
    Vaccine Failure — Over 1000 Got Mumps in NY in Last Six Months–over-1000-get-mumps-in-ny-in-last-six-months.aspx
  21. Vancouver Sun September 10, 2012
  22. Natural Immunity Superior to Vaccination Matthews and Associates
  23. "WHO assessed the overall public health risk at the national level to be very high and the risk of international spread to be high due to the proximity of the recent detection of the AFP case in Ituri which is close to an international border and with known population movement." World Health Organization, Circulating vaccine-derived poliovirus type 2 – Democratic Republic of the Congo
  24. [
  25. Alarming polio outbreak spreads in Congo, threatening global eradication efforts, By Leslie Roberts
  26. Natural and acquired immunity
  27. 27.0 27.1 27.2 27.3 Thimerosal and Animal Brains: New Data for Assessing Human Ethylmercury Risk, Julia R. Barrett
  28. Viral Interference: The Case of Influenza Viruses, The Journal of Infectious Diseases, Stacey Schultz-Cherry, PhD, Department of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, 05 May 2015
  29. Viral interference and interferon Ferdinando Dianzani, Istituto di Microbiologia, II Cattedra, dell’Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Santena 9, 10126, Torino, Italia
  30. Influenza vaccination and respiratory virus interference among Department of Defense personnel during the 2017-2018 influenza season. Vaccine. 2020 Jan 10;38(2):350-354. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
  31. Influenza vaccination and respiratory virus interference among Department of Defense personnel during the 2017-2018 influenza season. Vaccine. 2020 Jan 10;38(2):350-354. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
    "We randomized 115 children to trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine (TIV) or placebo. Over the following 9 months, TIV recipients had an increased risk of virologically-confirmed non-influenza infections (relative risk: 4.40; 95 confidence interval: 1.31-14.8). Being protected against influenza, TIV recipients may lack temporary non-specific immunity that protected against other respiratory viruses." © 2012 The Author.Increased risk of noninfluenza respiratory virus infections associated with receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine, Cowling, B.J., Fang, V.J., Nishiura, H., Chan, K.-H., Ng, S., Ip, D.K.M., Chiu, S.S., Leung, G.M., Malik Peiris, J.S.
  32. Increased risk of noninfluenza respiratory virus infections associated with receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine. Cowling BJ, Fang VJ, Nishiura H, Chan KH, Ng S, Ip DK, Chiu SS, Leung GM, Peiris JS Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jun; 54(12):1778-83.
  33. "children who contract polio generally suffer only mild symptoms, but as a result they become permanently immune to the disease." Yin-Murphy M, Almond JW (1996). et al. (eds.). Picornaviruses: The Enteroviruses: Polioviruses in: Baron's Medical Microbiology (4th ed.). Univ of Texas Medical Branch. ISBN 0-9631172-1-1.
  34. An antigen is a toxin or other foreign substance which induces an immune response in the body, especially the production of antibodies. Antigens are molecules capable of stimulating an immune response. Each antigen has distinct surface features, or epitopes, resulting in specific responses. Antibodies (immunoglobins) are Y-shaped proteins produced by B cells of the immune system in response to exposure to antigens.
  35. An antibody is a blood protein produced in response to and counteracting a specific antigen. Antibodies combine chemically with substances which the body recognizes as alien, such as bacteria, viruses, and foreign substances in the blood.
  36. 36.0 36.1 36.2 36.3 36.4 36.5 36.6 PCR or RT-PCR test is only measuring the presence of the [ribonucleic acid, or RNA] of a virus or fungus or bacteria in the host of the human sample. It is not virus-specific. RT-PCR or "Reverse Transcription-PCR, is RNA genetic material transcribed in reverse as a cDNA complement(DNA has introns, cDNA doesn't). This is amplified using the PCR which should result as "presence or absence" of the amplified gene product. RT-PCR is used to amplify whereas the Quantitative polymerase chain reaction(QPCR or PCR) measures the amplification. It is used as a diagnostic tool for detecting infectious agents such as the avian flu virus and 2019-nCoV.
  37. 37.0 37.1 37.2 37.3 Estimating the asymptomatic proportion of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases on board the Diamond Princess cruise ship, Yokohama, Japan, 2020 Kenji Mizumoto1, Katsushi Kagaya, Alexander Zarebski, Gerardo Chowell
  38. 38.0 38.1 38.2 38.3 Cruise ship outbreak helps pin down how deadly the new coronavirus is - Outcomes suggest that, in the real world, about 0.5 percent of COVID-19 infections in China end in death By Tina Hesman Saey, MARCH 12, 2020
  39. 39.0 39.1 Factors of contagious spread ar R0 and SI. R0 is pronounced “R naught.” The formal definition of a disease's R0 is the number of cases, on average, an infected person will cause during their infectious period. R0 value only applies when everyone in a population is completely vulnerable to the disease. The new coronavirus has an estimated R0 of roughly 2 to 2.5 with Fergison estimating 3.1 and some as high as 3.58 with an 8-fold to 2-fold increase in the reporting rate. This number will immediately decrease as society moves toward heard immunity until this disease can no longer spread through the population.
    The serial interval (SI) of an infectious disease represents the duration between symptom onset of a primary case and symptom onset of its secondary cases. Estimates for coronavirus have ranged from 4.4 days to 7.6. The estimated serial intervals as an example have been calculated for influenza A(H3N2) (2.2 days), pandemic influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 (2.8 days), respiratory syncytial virus (7.5 days), measles (11.7 days), varicella (14.0 days), smallpox (17.7 days), mumps (18.0 days), rubella (18.3 days), and pertussis (22.8 days).
  41. Oxford Model: Coronavirus May Have Already Infected Half of U.K. Population, By Matt Stieb with models. Half of all Britons believed to be infected with coronavirus already, Oxford study asserts
  42. [ Coronavirus may have already infected half of UK, study says By Adam Schrader, March 24, 2020 ]
  43. Herd immunity: Why Britain is actually letting the coronavirus spread Sydney Morning Herald; 15/03/2020
  44. March 20, 2020
  45. Modelling Herd Immunity
  46. ‘We’re Flying Blind’: Why Testing for Coronavirus Antibodies Will Matter New York Magazine, March 22, 2020
  47. Why Britain is actually letting the coronavirus spread Sydney Morning Herald; 15/03/2020
  48. Fundamental principles of epidemic spread highlight the immediate need for large-scale serological surveys to assess the stage of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic
  49. Fears social distancing could last up to a year
  50. 50.0 50.1 50.2 50.3 50.4 We Were Wrong: So Sorry that We Ruined Your Life, Jeffrey A. Tucker, American Institute for Economic Research – March 28, 2020.
  51. New blood tests for antibodies could show the true scale of coronavirus pandemic By Gretchen Vogel, American Association for the Advancement of Science. Mar. 19, 2020
  52. the new virus known as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
  53. Mount Sinai Developing an “End-to-End” Diagnostics Solution for COVID-19 That Incorporates Diagnosis, Treatment Selection, and Monitoring of Disease Course New York, NY (March 23, 2020)
  54. 54.0 54.1 54.2 54.3 Governor Cuomo: Trump Quarantining New York To Stop Coronavirus Is ‘Declaration Of War’ On New York, By Daily Wire News. MARCH 28TH, 2020.
  55. Isaiah 51:21 Therefore hear now this, thou afflicted, and drunken, but not with wine:
  56. Revelation 16:13 And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.
    Revelation 19:20 And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
    Revelation 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.
  57. Proverbs 23:21 For the drunkard and the glutton shall come to poverty: and drowsiness shall clothe [a man] with rags.
  58. Proverbs 4:17 For they eat the bread of wickedness, and drink the wine of violence.
  60. Every year there are a variety of flu viruses circulating through populations where people who have not come into contact with that flu may become ill for a few days. Because we can now test for antibodies there is scientific evidence many people become immune to disease and never appear to have been ill. Those who sho symptoms and those who are asymptomatic both become immune adding to the herd immunity of society.
  61. [ Covid-19 — Navigating the Uncharted] List of authors. Anthony S. Fauci, M.D., H. Clifford Lane, M.D., and Robert R. Redfield, M.D.
    "If one assumes that the number of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic cases is several times as high as the number of reported cases, the case fatality rate may be considerably less than 1%. This suggests that the overall clinical consequences of Covid-19 may ultimately be more akin to those of a severe seasonal influenza (which has a case fatality rate of approximately 0.1%) or a pandemic influenza (similar to those in 1957 and 1968) rather than a disease similar to SARS or MERS, which have had case fatality rates of 9 to 10% and 36%, respectively."
  62. EO on Delegating Additional Authority Under the DPA with Respect to Health and Medical Resources to Respond to the Spread of COVID-19
  63. EO to Order the Selected Reserve and Certain Members of the Individual Ready Reserve of the Armed Forces to Active Duty
  64. “We did not prove an association between measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine and the syndrome described. Virological studies are underway that may help to resolve the issues. If there is a causal link between measles, mumps and rubella vaccine and this syndrome, a rising incidence might be anticipated after the introduction of this vaccine in the UK in 1988. Published evidence is inadequate to show whether there is a change…”
  65. Dr. Andy Wakefield vs Brian Deer: The Real Fraud Revealed

Join The Living Network of The Companies of Ten
The Living Network | Join Local group | About | Purpose | Guidelines | Network Removal
Contact Minister | Fractal Network | Audacity of Hope | Network Links