Template:Melchizedek: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
It certainly contradicts what some churches are teaching today to promote their private interpretation of the Bible. | It certainly contradicts what some churches are teaching today to promote their private interpretation of the Bible. | ||
Many, if not most, Jewish scholars before and after Christ believed Shem and Melchizedek were one in the same and wrote about them as the same individual.<Ref>e Jewish rabbi Rashi (born 1040), “The Midrash identifies him | |||
[Melchizedek] with Shem.” A. Cohen, The Soncino Chumash: The Five Books of Moses with Haphtaroth (London: The Soncino Press, 1983), 69.</Ref> | |||
The | We can also see, “In Rabb. exegesis it was often conjectured that Melchizedek was another name for Shem, the son of Noah”.<Ref>O. Michel, “Melcisede,k,” Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, ed.. Gerhard Kittel, trans. Geoffrey Bromiley, vol. 4 (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977), 569. </Ref> | ||
Professor Fred Horton observes that from “an early time Melchizedek was identified by the Rabbis with Shem, the son of Noah”<Ref>The Melchizedek Tradition, 114.</Ref> He went on to point out that Shem was identified as Melchizedek “by the first third of the second century A.D., as is shown by several quotations from R. Ishmael ben Elisha”. | |||
Saint Epiphanius of Constantia (born c. 315) and later the bishop of Salamis did assert that “at present some people have different ideas about who Melchizedek is. Some think that he is by nature the [[Son of God]] who appeared to Abraham back then in human form.” | |||
Dr. R. Larry Overstreet in his attempt to identify Melchizedek states, "The title “Son of God” is crucial in this context since it points to the eternal nature of Christ. "<Ref>THE SUPERIORITY OF CHRIST: THE IDENTITY OF MELCHIZEDEK IN HEBREWS, Dr. R. Larry Overstreet</Ref> But the phrase or the title of "the [[Son of God]]" had also been applied by the people for centuries to the [[Caesar]]s among others who sought to be the rulers of the [[world]]. | |||
If Shem was a descendent of Noah who was righteous in his generation then he was the heir to the world as a descendent of Adam. And if he remained faithful to [[The Way]] of righteousness depending on the [[freewill offerings]] of [[tithes]] rather than the taxes of Nimrod or Cain then he could be considered both the ''righteous king of peace'' and priest to the faithful who sought the [[Kingdom of God]]. | |||
It is only modern church goers and some seminary graduates who are unaware of the connection. | It is only modern church goers and some seminary graduates who are unaware of the connection. | ||
In most of the copies of the Masoretic Hebrew text the word "malki zedek" is written as two words. It was the Septuagint that slid the two terms together. But even that does not make it a name as we think of it. Both the Epistle to the Hebrews and Josephus interpret the word "malki" as meaning "the king", and "tzedek" as meaning "righteous" or "just". It was a description of an office or status like the word Augustus which was not the name of Octavius but his title. Even the term Caesar was an office, not a name of the individuals who held the office. | |||
In most of the copies of the Masoretic Hebrew text the word "malki zedek" is written as two words. It was the Septuagint that slid the two terms together. But even that does not make it a name as we might think of it today. | |||
Both the Epistle to the Hebrews and Josephus interpret the word "malki" as meaning "the king", and "tzedek" as meaning "righteous" or "just". It was a description of an office or status like the word Augustus which was not the name of Octavius but his title. Even the term [[Caesar]] was an office, not a name of the individuals who held the office. | |||
Anyone who thinks the king's name just happened to be the Hebrew word for ''righteous King'' is being wishfully naive. | Anyone who thinks the king's name just happened to be the Hebrew word for ''righteous King'' is being wishfully naive. | ||
| Line 26: | Line 39: | ||
Even Wikipedia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melchizedek] along with stacks of ancient Hebrew texts from the Targums to the Talmud write of them being one in the same. | Even Wikipedia [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melchizedek] along with stacks of ancient Hebrew texts from the Targums to the Talmud write of them being one in the same. | ||
Parallels between this ''righteous King of peace'' and Jesus of Nazareth should be clear. Both Melchizedek and Jesus serve God as | Parallels between this ''righteous King of peace'' and Jesus of Nazareth should be clear. Both Melchizedek and Jesus serve God as the righteous firstborn son. Both were priest and king. Both were princes or kings of peace with Jesus actually being the king of Jerusalem physically and spiritually. Jerusalem means ''double peace''. Both brought offerings of bread and wine which we call the [[Eucharist]] which symbolized the benefits of God's kingdom on earth from generation to generation. They were able to feed the people because they both received [[Tithing|tithes]] and offerings.<Ref>Abraham gave tithes to Shem who was the rightful head of his family being the eldest Father. Genesis 14:20 And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand. And he gave him tithes of all.</Ref> | ||
The priesthood of all these nations had the responsibility of [[Welfare|welfare]] for society and there were always two [[Welfare_types|types of welfare]] which defined the nature of [[Religion|religion]] and the methods used by the [[Altars|altars]] and [[Temples|temples]]. | The priesthood of all these nations had the responsibility of [[Welfare|welfare]] for society and there were always two [[Welfare_types|types of welfare]] which defined the nature of [[Religion|religion]] and the methods used by the [[Altars|altars]] and [[Temples|temples]]. | ||
But if someone wants to read the [[HHC publications|books]] and only hear verification of what they have already accepted as true, they will be disappointed. The books by their nature are [[Iconoclast|iconoclastic]]. Just as the Pharisees had misinterpreted the Torah, so also do many modern Christians misinterpret the truth expressed with in the Biblical texts. | But if someone wants to read the [[HHC publications|books]] and only hear verification of what they have already accepted as true, they will be disappointed. The books by their nature are [[Iconoclast|iconoclastic]]. Just as the Pharisees had misinterpreted the [[Torah]], so also do many modern Christians misinterpret the truth expressed with in the Biblical texts. | ||
Just as an example, Modern Churches tell their supporters that it is okay to desire benefits from governments and rulers who call themselves [[Benefactors]] but exercise authority one over the other. This is contrary to the fact that Jesus Christ instructed very clearly that it was not to be so with us<Ref>Luke 22:25 And he said unto them, The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them are called benefactors. But ye shall not be so: </Ref> and so did Moses. | Just as an example, Modern Churches tell their supporters that it is okay to desire benefits from governments and rulers who call themselves [[Benefactors]] but exercise authority one over the other. This is contrary to the fact that Jesus Christ instructed very clearly that it was not to be so with us<Ref>Luke 22:25 And he said unto them, The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them are called benefactors. But ye shall not be so: </Ref> and so did Moses. | ||
Revision as of 10:00, 7 October 2022
In the book Thy Kingdom Comes we find on page 15:
- "The generations of Abraham were Shem, begat Arphaxad, Shelah, Eber, Peleg, Reu, Serug, Nahor, Terah, Abram who became Abraham. Amongst all the descendants of Shem, there were many that disagreed and even fought over who should be the rightful heir to the blessings of Shem. Shem was rightful king as elder of the family of man and, according to Bible chronologists, Shem was still around when Abraham expatriated from his father and the matrix of the City-State. Since Noah and his wife had died, Shem was a righteous king of peace. He was without Father and Mother and was possessor of all his rights. Shem was sui juris according to the family laws that preceded the codification by kings. Although he had produced many heirs, no one had been chosen. There was no one worthy of the honor and blessing of that royal office of the righteous King of Peace."
- “And Melchizedek [righteous king] king of Salem [peace] brought forth bread and wine: and he [was] the priest of the most high God. And he blessed him, and said, Blessed [be] Abram of the most high God, possessor of heaven and earth:” Genesis 14:18-19
Modern Christians reading this have immediately concluded that the book is in error because that is not what they were taught saying "Equating Shem to the King of Salem and Melchizedek (pg 15) is completely false as the context quickly indicates."
The context of what?
It certainly contradicts what some churches are teaching today to promote their private interpretation of the Bible.
Many, if not most, Jewish scholars before and after Christ believed Shem and Melchizedek were one in the same and wrote about them as the same individual.[1]
We can also see, “In Rabb. exegesis it was often conjectured that Melchizedek was another name for Shem, the son of Noah”.[2]
Professor Fred Horton observes that from “an early time Melchizedek was identified by the Rabbis with Shem, the son of Noah”[3] He went on to point out that Shem was identified as Melchizedek “by the first third of the second century A.D., as is shown by several quotations from R. Ishmael ben Elisha”.
Saint Epiphanius of Constantia (born c. 315) and later the bishop of Salamis did assert that “at present some people have different ideas about who Melchizedek is. Some think that he is by nature the Son of God who appeared to Abraham back then in human form.”
Dr. R. Larry Overstreet in his attempt to identify Melchizedek states, "The title “Son of God” is crucial in this context since it points to the eternal nature of Christ. "[4] But the phrase or the title of "the Son of God" had also been applied by the people for centuries to the Caesars among others who sought to be the rulers of the world.
If Shem was a descendent of Noah who was righteous in his generation then he was the heir to the world as a descendent of Adam. And if he remained faithful to The Way of righteousness depending on the freewill offerings of tithes rather than the taxes of Nimrod or Cain then he could be considered both the righteous king of peace and priest to the faithful who sought the Kingdom of God.
It is only modern church goers and some seminary graduates who are unaware of the connection.
In most of the copies of the Masoretic Hebrew text the word "malki zedek" is written as two words. It was the Septuagint that slid the two terms together. But even that does not make it a name as we might think of it today.
Both the Epistle to the Hebrews and Josephus interpret the word "malki" as meaning "the king", and "tzedek" as meaning "righteous" or "just". It was a description of an office or status like the word Augustus which was not the name of Octavius but his title. Even the term Caesar was an office, not a name of the individuals who held the office.
Anyone who thinks the king's name just happened to be the Hebrew word for righteous King is being wishfully naive.
Just research the words Melchizedek and Shem and you will see a wealth of information that corroborates the fact that it has always been well accepted and common knowledge that Shem and Melchizedek were the same. [1] [2] [3]
Even Wikipedia [4] along with stacks of ancient Hebrew texts from the Targums to the Talmud write of them being one in the same.
Parallels between this righteous King of peace and Jesus of Nazareth should be clear. Both Melchizedek and Jesus serve God as the righteous firstborn son. Both were priest and king. Both were princes or kings of peace with Jesus actually being the king of Jerusalem physically and spiritually. Jerusalem means double peace. Both brought offerings of bread and wine which we call the Eucharist which symbolized the benefits of God's kingdom on earth from generation to generation. They were able to feed the people because they both received tithes and offerings.[5]
The priesthood of all these nations had the responsibility of welfare for society and there were always two types of welfare which defined the nature of religion and the methods used by the altars and temples.
But if someone wants to read the books and only hear verification of what they have already accepted as true, they will be disappointed. The books by their nature are iconoclastic. Just as the Pharisees had misinterpreted the Torah, so also do many modern Christians misinterpret the truth expressed with in the Biblical texts.
Just as an example, Modern Churches tell their supporters that it is okay to desire benefits from governments and rulers who call themselves Benefactors but exercise authority one over the other. This is contrary to the fact that Jesus Christ instructed very clearly that it was not to be so with us[6] and so did Moses.
As for what Romans 13 is actually saying there is a whole Book that deals with the Modern interpretations and confusions: The Higher Liberty. And the belief in the Constitution as something sacred and/or designed around biblical principles is shattered in the book Contracts, Covenants and Constitutions.
Appearance
Old Testament
- Genesis 14:18 And Melchizedek king of Salem brought forth bread and wine: and he was the priest of the most high God.
- Psalms 110:4 The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order[7] of Melchizedek.
New Testament
- Hebrews 5:6 As he saith also in another place, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.
- Hebrews 5:10 Called of God an high priest after the order of Melchisedec.
- Hebrews 6:20 Whither the forerunner is for us entered, even Jesus, made an high priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec.
- Hebrews 7:1 For this Melchisedec, king of Salem, priest of the most high God, who met Abraham returning from the slaughter of the kings, and blessed him;
- Hebrews 7:10 For he was yet in the loins of his father, when Melchisedec met him.
- Hebrews 7:11 If therefore perfection were by the Levitical priesthood, (for under it the people received the law,) what further need was there that another priest should rise after the order of Melchisedec, and not be called after the order of Aaron?
- Hebrews 7:15 And it is yet far more evident: for that after the similitude of Melchisedec there ariseth another priest,
- Hebrews 7:17 For he testifieth, Thou art a priest for ever after the order[8] of Melchisedec.
- Hebrews 7:21 (For those priests were made without an oath; but this with an oath by him that said unto him, The Lord sware and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec:)
- ↑ e Jewish rabbi Rashi (born 1040), “The Midrash identifies him [Melchizedek] with Shem.” A. Cohen, The Soncino Chumash: The Five Books of Moses with Haphtaroth (London: The Soncino Press, 1983), 69.
- ↑ O. Michel, “Melcisede,k,” Theological Dictionary of the New Testament, ed.. Gerhard Kittel, trans. Geoffrey Bromiley, vol. 4 (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977), 569.
- ↑ The Melchizedek Tradition, 114.
- ↑ THE SUPERIORITY OF CHRIST: THE IDENTITY OF MELCHIZEDEK IN HEBREWS, Dr. R. Larry Overstreet
- ↑ Abraham gave tithes to Shem who was the rightful head of his family being the eldest Father. Genesis 14:20 And blessed be the most high God, which hath delivered thine enemies into thy hand. And he gave him tithes of all.
- ↑ Luke 22:25 And he said unto them, The kings of the Gentiles exercise lordship over them; and they that exercise authority upon them are called benefactors. But ye shall not be so:
- ↑ 01700 ^הרבד^ dibrah \@dib-raw’\@ fem. of 01697; n m; AV-cause 1, order 1, estate 1, end 1, regard 1; 5 1) cause, manner, reason
- ↑ 5010 ~τάξις~ taxis \@tax’-is\@ from 5021; ; n f AV-order 10; 10
- 1) an arranging, arrangement
- 2) order
- 2a) a fixed succession observing a fixed time
- 3) due or right order, orderly condition
- 4) the post, rank, or position which one holds in civic or other affairs
- 4a) since this position generally depends on one’s talents, experience, resources
- 4a1) character, fashion, quality, style