Talk:Tens: Difference between revisions

From PreparingYou
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Dr Shiva exposes the enemies of the people, their freedom, and free speech in America and their collusion with both left and right leaders in government.
Moved content concerning Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai to http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Talk:Public_Health#Informed_consent
 
Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai on "Government With Big Tech Destroys Free Speech" at the Mike Lindell Cyber Symposium -
 
https://rumble.com/vl151q-mike-lindell-cyber-symposium-dr.-shiva-ayyadurai-government-with-big-tech-d.html
 
He gets going around 14 minutes exposing in court a true conspiracy against the people and shut down free flow of information.
 
Dr Shiva says:
 
"The real problem is [[Public Health]]."
 
"Americans have become fat, dumb, and happy."
 
The answer "is not cursing at the darkness but we need to become  the light".
 
"The way to go forward from here is a bottoms up movement."
 
The only way out, he says is, is a ''bottom up movement''.
The truth is Jesus knew that better than most. That is why Christ [[commanded]] His [[called out]] [[disciples]] to organize the people into groups of [[tens]] who were willing to [[network]] together in thousands before there would be any ''loaves and fishes''.
 
All people who seek [[perfect law of liberty|liberty under God]] need to sit down in the [[Tens|tens, hundreds, and thousands ]]because that is what Jesus [[commanded]] and it is the only practical way of establishing a bottoms up movement to stand against a common enemy of ''the truth which is what sets you free''.
 
Without the movement away from the [[covetous practices]] of the [[world]] there is no way out.
 
We need to create the ''bands of a free society'' which a sincere and loving approach to the ''care of one another''. When America was great it was not a result of government.<Ref>" I sought for the greatness and genius of America in her commodious harbors and her ample rivers, and it was not there… in her fertile fields and boundless forests, and it was not there…in her rich mines and her vast world commerce, and it was not there… in her democratic Congress and her matchless Constitution, and it was not there. Not until I went into the churches of America and heard her pulpits flame with righteousness did I understand the secret of her genius and power. America is great because America is good; and if America ever ceases to be good, America will cease to be great."
<Br>
"An old and sincere friend of America, I am uneasy at seeing Slavery retard her progress, tarnishher glory, furnish arms to her detractors, compromise the future career of the Union which is the guaranty of her safety and greatness, and point out beforehand to her, to all her enemies,the spot where they are to strike. As a man, too, I am moved at the spectacle of man’s degradation by man, and I hope to see the day when the law will grant equal civil liberty to all the inhabitants of the same empire, as God accords the freedom of the will, without distinction, to the dwellers of earth."
<Br>
"The love and respect of your neighbors must be gained by a long series of small services, hidden deeds of goodness, a persistent habit of kindness, and an established reputation of selflessness" (Tocqueville 1840, 593).
<Br>
"...boldness of enterprise is the foremost cause of (America's) progress, its strength, and its greatness." "They (men living in democracies) are therefore all led to engage in commerce, not only for the sake of the profit it holds out to them, but for the love of the constant excitement occasioned by that pursuit," Alexis de Tocqueville</Ref> Nor was it by freedom alone, but the acceptance of a moral<Ref>“There have never been free societies without morals, and…it is the woman that molds the morals,”</Ref> responsibility and that was found in the family undivided.<Ref>"I did not notice that American women considered conjugal authority as a happy usurpation of their rights, or that they believed that it was degrading to submit to it. I seemed to see, on the contrary, that they took a kind of glory in the voluntary surrender of their will, and that they located their grandeur in bending to the yoke themselves and not in escaping it."
<Br>
"There are men in Europe who, confusing the different attributes of the sexes, claim to make the man and the woman beings, not only equal, but similar. They give to the one as to the other the same functions, impose the same duties on them, and grant them the same rights; they mix them in everything, work, pleasures, public affairs. It can easily be imagined that by trying hard in this way to make one sex equal to the other, both are degraded; and that from this crude mixture of the works of nature only weak men and dishonest women can ever emerge.</Ref>
 
Without healthy families there cannot be a healthy society. In a free society families bind themselves with [[trust]] and hope in free assemblies of choice and [[charity]].
 
This was done by the people through free associations,<Ref>    “Americans of all ages, all stations in life, and all types of disposition are forever forming associations. There are not only commercial and industrial associations in which all take part, but other of a thousand different types — religious, moral, serious, futile, very general and very limited, immensely large and very minute. … Finally, if they want to proclaim a truth or propagate some feeling by the encouragement of a great example, they form an association. In every case, as the head of any new undertaking, where in France you would find the government or in England some territorial magnate, in the United States you are sure to find an association.” Alexis de Tocqueville 1840, Democracy in America
<Br>
"Americans group together to hold fêtes, found seminaries, build inns, construct churches, distribute books, dispatch missionaries to the antipodes. They establish hospitals, prisons, schools by the same method. Finally, if they wish to highlight a truth or develop an opinion by the encouragement of a great example, they form an association." Alexis de Tocqueville 1840, Democracy in America 596. </Ref> through the freedom of [[faith]], [[hope]], and [[charity]] instead of [[force]], [[fear]], and [[fealty]].
 
If you understand what the word [[religion]] use to mean we could also understand that every ''bottoms up movement'' must include the taking back of the responsibility of [[Public Health]] which is a duty to God and our fellowman.
 
[[Moses]] and [[Jesus]] said we were to [[love]] our neighbor as ourselves. The told us not to engage in [[covetous practices]] or seek the [[wages of unrighteousness|rewards of unrighteousness]] through men who call themselves [[benefactors]] but [[exercise authority]] one over the other.
 
This can only be done through through what use to be called the practice of [[Pure Religion]].




Line 50: Line 5:
--  
--  


----




Revision as of 09:15, 14 August 2021

Moved content concerning Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai to http://preparingyou.com/wiki/Talk:Public_Health#Informed_consent


--




In "The World Under God’s Law, The Church Under God’s Law", Professor Rushdoony, (Dr. R.J.) describe the congregations Paul was setting up, "To this day, at least among the Jews, all it takes to form a synagog is ten elders! Ten men, rather. They constitute enough for one ruler, and without any rabbii called they constitute a synagog and the elder who was chosen by the ten heads of household conduct the services. That’s the way it was. "

"The apostles as they went out established, Paul for example, church after church in one place after another and he appointed and ordained elders, and he moved on. Did the services stop when left? No, they continued. The elder carried on the services, or the elders, if there were twenty families, there would be two elders; thirty families, three elders. Then these elders who would be trained by the apostles, Peter or Paul, whoever went out, would then carry on services around so that their work would be extended. And this is how the missionary work of the church went on. You will recall from the book of Acts that the apostles hit the cities, they established churches there. Those churches, the elders thereof, would go out into the surrounding countryside to the smaller communities and villages and establish congregations there. [0:11:46]"

The pattern is true but the use of the term elder is incorrect. While elders were appointed to serve the people it is not an office of the Church See Elder

Ruth 4:2 And he took ten men of the elders of the city, and said, Sit ye down here. And they sat down.


There is no difference in the canons of Christ’s kingdom “at hand” and the Kingdom of God that Moses tried to teach the people. The Levites were servants of the congregations of men. They belonged to God as his bondservants with no inheritance. Each one served ten families, who chose them as ministers, and to whom were tithed in accordance to their service.[1]

The Church called out by Christ did the same as that earlier Church in the wilderness called out by Moses. They taught a kingdom of God organized by congregation of tens.

“And in those days Peter stood up in the midst of the disciples, and said, (the number of names together were about an hundred and twenty,)” Acts 1:15

Here, 12 apostles and 120 families were the beginning foundation of the Christian Church. The apostles were bondservants appointed by Christ to minister to the congregation of the people. In order to discern exactly how all this worked together for good, we must explore those ancient times.

Even as late as the 9th and 10th century, among the Lombard kings there was something called Deans connected to ten families. The word originated from the Latin “decanus”, which was a military term of the Romans. Decurius was also used by early writers. This included the Greek deka and dekate, meaning ten or tithe.

The term was used to described those men performing functions of the secular clergy. This term was used by what we might call ministers of the early ecclesiastical Church. That clergy was much different in their position to authority and function than those now held in what we have come to believe is the Church. They held that office which included a position in their judicial system chosen from the bottom up. Some have tried to assert that a Dean was in authority over those ten families, but the terms used to describe the office clearly establish it as a subordinate position with respect and service to the people. It was a part of their system of governance, but its leaders were titular.

Terms like decurions signified those who served ten deans. As the network of tens, fifties, and hundreds grew, there was a need for assistance like the heralds of the kings and the singers[2] and Nethinims[3] of the Levites who performed important functions of keeping the people and ministers informed. The chore pisco pus was an assistant to the overseer or Bishop to keep the communion between the congregation effectual. Over the centuries, this special communications officer for the government of the people was degenerated into the director of the choir.

The communion of the first-century Church was substantive, filling the true physical and spiritual needs of the people. Those who received Christ’s baptism were cast out[4] of one system of authoritarian government of the Pharisees and entered a government of faith, hope, and charity under the perfect law of liberty. Christians depended upon the freewill charity of each other, not the entitlements of Rome or the synagogue of Satan.[5]

“Ye cannot drink the cup of the Lord, and the cup of devils: ye cannot be partakers of the Lord’s table, and of the table of devils.” 1 Corinthians 10:21

According to Garcillasso de Vega an ancient Inca historian, Peru was divided into small districts containing ten families each which registered under a magistrate who had authority to decide little differences and punish petty crimes. Five of these groups of tens composed a higher class or fifty families and two of these fifties composed a hundred. Finally, ten hundreds composed a larger group of a thousand families. Moses did something similar but without centralizing power over the people that might subjugate them. [6]

Like any good capitalist grey squirrel, I can go out in the woods and collect nuts for the winter and bring them back to my borough. The pile of nuts is an extension of my labor spent over the summer so that I and my family will not starve.

If red squirrels try to come in and grab my nuts for themselves after I spent all summer gathering them for winter that would not be "proper or right". That would be a violation of my "property rights".

I do not need a government to protect my property.

But if there are a lot of "red comrade squirrels" I may call my brother squirrels and we may defend our nuts from the red menace.

We are still anarchist and capitalist squirrels because we have no rulers but only brothers.

There have been lots of governments without rulers but it takes a special kind of squirrel. They have to care about their neighbor's nuts as much as they care about their own. http://www.preparingyou.com/wiki/Tens




If you need help:

Or want to help others:

Join The Living Network of The Companies of Ten
The Living Network | Join Local group | About | Purpose | Guidelines | Network Removal
Contact Minister | Fractal Network | Audacity of Hope | Network Links

Footnotes

  1. ↑ Nu 7:5 “Take [it] of them, that they may be to do the service of the tabernacle of the congregation; and thou shalt give them unto the Levites, to every man according to his service.”
  2. ↑ There were several different forms of this word translated into singer, sheer or shuwr. These were identical with shoor which meant to travel, journey, go [through the idea of strolling minstrelsy]; Minstrels sang and recited poetically because it was easier to remember messages and communications accurately. They were the newsmen or heralds of official business. The singers were travelers because they had to deliver the news and messages all around the kingdom of God in order to keep the people informed.
  3. ↑ Nethinims were commissioned ministers of the Levites licensed to act ex officio.
  4. ↑ John 9:22 “These [words] spake his parents, because they feared the Jews: for the Jews had agreed already, that if any man did confess that he was Christ, he should be put out of the synagogue.”
  5. ↑ Revelation 2:9 “I know thy works, and tribulation, and poverty, (but thou art rich) and [I know] the blasphemy of them which say they are Jews, and are not, but [are] the synagogue of Satan.”
  6. ↑ A classical and archaeological dictionary of the manners, customs, laws ... By P. Austin Nuttall
Retrieved from "http://preparingyou.com/wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Tens&oldid=43045"