Stoning: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:17, 15 August 2016

Moses and Jesus were in agreement but the Pharisees had it wrong.

The Altars of Abraham and Moses were stones fit together without hewing those stones. Were those altars dead or living stones?

If they were living stones what did it mean to stone someone at the gates or against a wall in the city?

Taking some one to court made up of a jury of "Living Stones".

Stoning someone was like taking someone to the court made up of the Living Stones and producing the verdict of shunning inside the imaginary walls of society or banishment outside the gates of that community or communion. It was excommunication, being evicted from the community and the welfare system of God.

It did not originally mean to pick up rocks and throw them at someone to murder them. "Thou Shall Not Kill" and not oppressing the stranger and giving drink to the enemy were all a part of the Old Testament.

Israel took care of the needy through the freewill offerings of Corban without the Covetous Practices of the modern Benefactors of the welfare state which has been a snare which has cursed children with debt and bondage and made men Merchandise as surety for that debt .

To be banished from a community could be a death sentence. It certainly would be throwing you to the dogs of societies all around you where you would be forced to labor under the rulers of the rest of the world.

Israel originally operated by the perfect law of liberty with freewill offerings but the charity which flowed through the ministers or Levites of that church in the wilderness needed to flow freely from the moral members of society to the moral and virtuous members of that society.

Their sacrifices, even those of the Red Heifer had a purpose and value among the virtuous people of societies. While there was no shame in being poor there was no virtue in poverty. If people were to be helped they needed to meet a moral criteria of righteous behavior or go somewhere else. That left few options that did not include a bondage under a master other than God the father.

Socialists hate virtue which reveals their sloth and covetousness.

The early Church actually operated much like early Israel in the tradition of a Pure Republic by way of Pure Religion. This infuriated the Pharisees with the Baptism of Herod which followed the socialist's agenda of the new deal of Rome and its imperial cult.

If the Christian conflict that was recording in Roman history the Modern Christians would be the new Pharisees.

If you need help:

Or want to help others:

See more Forbidden Definitions

Revision as of 10:26, 14 August 2016 (view source) Wiki1 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:17, 15 August 2016 (view source) Wiki1 (talk \| contribs) No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[File:stoning.jpg\|right\|thumb\| [[Moses]] and [[Jesus]] were in agreement but the [[Pharisees]] had it wrong.]]The [[Altars]] of [[Abraham]] and [[Moses]] were stones fit together without hewing those [[stones]]. Were those [[altars]] dead or [[White stones\|living stones]]?		[[File:stoning.jpg\|right\|200px\|thumb\| [[Moses]] and [[Jesus]] were in agreement but the [[Pharisees]] had it wrong.]]The [[Altars]] of [[Abraham]] and [[Moses]] were stones fit together without hewing those [[stones]]. Were those [[altars]] dead or [[White stones\|living stones]]?

	If they were living stones what did it mean to stone someone at the gates or against a wall in the city?		If they were living stones what did it mean to stone someone at the gates or against a wall in the city?

Stoning: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:17, 15 August 2016

Navigation menu

Search