Saving Babylon: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:56, 24 July 2015

Conversation with Jim was on the same Facebook sight but talked about saving Social Security. In fact he wants to save the government and return to a constitutional government with Republican values. The two ideas contradict each other. Social security is either a tonteen system, a socialist system or patrimonial system of benefits from men who call themselves Benefactors but exercise authority one over the other, or possibly all three. It is very similar to the system of Corban started by the Pharisees and Herod that Jesus said made the word of God to none effect.

In any case it is bankrupt and has no place in a Pure Republic.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-[[Conversation with Jim]] was on the same Facebook sight but talked about saving Social Security.
+[[Conversation with Jim]] was on the same Facebook sight but talked about saving Social Security. In fact he wants to save the government and return to a constitutional government with Republican values. The two ideas contradict each other. Social security is either a tonteen system, a socialist system or patrimonial system of benefits from men who call themselves [[Benefactors]] but exercise authority one over the other, or possibly all three. It is very similar to the system of [[Corban]] started by the Pharisees and Herod that Jesus said made the word of God to none effect.
-We will add more to this page
+In any case [[Not so Secure Socialism|it is bankrupt]] and has no place in a Pure [[Republic]].
+{{Template:Governments}}

Saving Babylon: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:56, 24 July 2015

Navigation menu

Search