Template:Zealot: Difference between revisions
(→Zealot) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Zealot == | == Zealot == | ||
The book | The book [[Zealot]] by self-proclaimed expert<Ref>Ipse Dixit "He, himself, said it". In logic, ipse dixit is known as the bare assertion fallacy. ipse dixit is an assertion without proof; or a dogmatic expression of opinion. The fallacy of defending a proposition by baldly asserting that it is "just how it is" distorts the argument by opting out of it entirely: the claimant declares an issue to be intrinsic, and not changeable. </Ref> Reza Aslan begs the question "Was Jesus a Zealot?" | ||
A '''zealot''' has become a person who is fanatical and uncompromising in pursuit of their religious, political, or other ideals. But historically he was a member of an ancient Jewish sect aiming at a world Jewish theocracy and resisting the Romans until AD 70. | A '''zealot''' has become a person who is fanatical and uncompromising in pursuit of their religious, political, or other ideals. But historically he was a member of an ancient Jewish sect aiming at a world Jewish theocracy and resisting the Romans until AD 70. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
"The Zealots were originally a political movement in 1st century Second Temple Judaism which sought to incite the people of Judaea Province to rebel against the Roman Empire and expel it from the Holy Land by force of arms, most notably during the First Jewish–Roman War (66-70). Zealotry was the term used by Josephus for a "fourth sect" during this period."[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zealots_%28Judea%29] | "The Zealots were originally a political movement in 1st century Second Temple Judaism which sought to incite the people of Judaea Province to rebel against the Roman Empire and expel it from the Holy Land by force of arms, most notably during the First Jewish–Roman War (66-70). Zealotry was the term used by Josephus for a "fourth sect" during this period."[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zealots_%28Judea%29] | ||
Was Jesus a Zealot? Is Reza Aslan wrong about Jesus? | Was Jesus a Zealot? | ||
Is Reza Aslan<Ref> Is a Professor of Sociology who believes he knows about "Religion" but has stated that “Religion is a language.” David Pakman is a critic https://youtu.be/E9RmAo6XVAA </Ref> wrong about Jesus? | |||
9/3/2013 1:40 PM 26693906 <Br>http://www.hisholychurch.net/kkvv/9thfolder/13-08-02-Asland-1.mp3<Br> | 9/3/2013 1:40 PM 26693906 <Br>http://www.hisholychurch.net/kkvv/9thfolder/13-08-02-Asland-1.mp3<Br> | ||
Revision as of 13:51, 4 February 2020
Zealot
The book Zealot by self-proclaimed expert[1] Reza Aslan begs the question "Was Jesus a Zealot?"
A zealot has become a person who is fanatical and uncompromising in pursuit of their religious, political, or other ideals. But historically he was a member of an ancient Jewish sect aiming at a world Jewish theocracy and resisting the Romans until AD 70.
"The Zealots were originally a political movement in 1st century Second Temple Judaism which sought to incite the people of Judaea Province to rebel against the Roman Empire and expel it from the Holy Land by force of arms, most notably during the First Jewish–Roman War (66-70). Zealotry was the term used by Josephus for a "fourth sect" during this period."[1]
Was Jesus a Zealot?
Is Reza Aslan[2] wrong about Jesus?
9/3/2013 1:40 PM 26693906
http://www.hisholychurch.net/kkvv/9thfolder/13-08-02-Asland-1.mp3
Reza Aslan "Zealot". Zealot: The Life and Times of Jesus of Nazareth, which offers an interpretation of the life and mission of the historical Jesus. Does he know what he is talking about?
9/3/2013 1:42 PM 23339575
http://www.hisholychurch.net/kkvv/9thfolder/13-08-02-Asland-2.mp3
9/3/2013 1:43 PM 23107456
http://www.hisholychurch.net/kkvv/9thfolder/13-08-02-Asland-3.mp3
9/3/2013 1:39 PM 23156279
http://www.hisholychurch.net/kkvv/9thfolder/13-08-02-Asland-4.mp3
- ↑ Ipse Dixit "He, himself, said it". In logic, ipse dixit is known as the bare assertion fallacy. ipse dixit is an assertion without proof; or a dogmatic expression of opinion. The fallacy of defending a proposition by baldly asserting that it is "just how it is" distorts the argument by opting out of it entirely: the claimant declares an issue to be intrinsic, and not changeable.
- ↑ Is a Professor of Sociology who believes he knows about "Religion" but has stated that “Religion is a language.” David Pakman is a critic https://youtu.be/E9RmAo6XVAA