Template:JPExE17: Difference between revisions
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
This idea put the administration of justice at the "micro" level of society where the people can seek to understand the [[weightier matters]] and exercise the personal responsibility to decide both the application of "fact and law". | This idea put the administration of justice at the "micro" level of society where the people can seek to understand the [[weightier matters]] and exercise the personal responsibility to decide both the application of "fact and law". | ||
While Peterson does understands that the absolute essential | While Peterson does understands that the absolute essential [[elements]] is not contractual but relational. What the panel never addresses is a key [[elements]] of this free society that both establishes the [[social bonds]] of mankind and tries men's souls. | ||
They did not question the text's authenticity, and they see the personal relationship as a means to order society. While they may begin to see the [[strong delusion]] of [[Modern Christian]] [[Religion]] keeps from seeing the those true bonds of aa free society. | |||
Revision as of 11:59, 25 May 2023
Episode 17
- "Exodus•May 3, 2023: "In the conclusion of Exodus, Jordan and the scholars recap the story of Exodus and the Israelites’ escape from tyranny to freedom. This episode also features a summation from each of the scholars as they share what has been illuminated for them through this discussion."
In this recap of Exodus Jordan Peterson sees Jethro's advise to Moses about a peoples court as subsidiarity which "is a principle of social organization that holds that social and political issues should be dealt with at the most immediate or local level."
This idea put the administration of justice at the "micro" level of society where the people can seek to understand the weightier matters and exercise the personal responsibility to decide both the application of "fact and law".
While Peterson does understands that the absolute essential elements is not contractual but relational. What the panel never addresses is a key elements of this free society that both establishes the social bonds of mankind and tries men's souls.
They did not question the text's authenticity, and they see the personal relationship as a means to order society. While they may begin to see the strong delusion of Modern Christian Religion keeps from seeing the those true bonds of aa free society.