Template:Vaccinated: Difference between revisions

From PreparingYou
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
== Vaccinated vs unvaccinated ==
== Vaccinated vs unvaccinated ==


There is one study the media uses to say unvaccinated are testing positive more than the vaccinated. It is not peer reviewed so I normally would not post it but it is so misleading it is good example of the false data being foisted on the people to perpetuate a false narative which is doing real harm.
There is one study the media uses to say unvaccinated are testing positive more than the [[vaccinated]]. It is not peer reviewed so I normally would not post it but it is so misleading it is good example of the false data being foisted on the people to perpetuate a false narative which is doing real harm.


In the study they admit they use 37 CT for unvaccinated and 27 CT for vaccinated. That will produce false numbers and make people think the unvaccinated are getting sicker than the vaccinated. It appears the opposite may be true but you need reporters and investigator searching out that truth. That is the kind of fake science that people are following in the media.  
In the study they admit they use 37 CT for unvaccinated and 27 CT for vaccinated. That will produce false numbers and make people think the unvaccinated are getting sicker than the vaccinated. It appears the opposite may be true but you need reporters and investigator searching out that truth. That is the kind of fake science that people are following in the media.  

Revision as of 09:18, 26 August 2021

Vaccinated vs unvaccinated

There is one study the media uses to say unvaccinated are testing positive more than the vaccinated. It is not peer reviewed so I normally would not post it but it is so misleading it is good example of the false data being foisted on the people to perpetuate a false narative which is doing real harm.

In the study they admit they use 37 CT for unvaccinated and 27 CT for vaccinated. That will produce false numbers and make people think the unvaccinated are getting sicker than the vaccinated. It appears the opposite may be true but you need reporters and investigator searching out that truth. That is the kind of fake science that people are following in the media.

You can read it for yourselves:
https://spiral.imperial.ac.uk/bitstream/10044/1/90800/2/react1_r13_final_preprint_final.pdf

In the beginning they made outlandish prediction which had to roll back but created panic and shutdown the people and their lives. Then they started counting every death that might have Covid based on a bogus PCR test despite other morbidities but now "The CDC stopped tracking most COVID-19 cases in vaccinated people. That makes it hard to know how dangerous Delta really is. https://www.businessinsider.com/risk-of-delta-variant-cdc-stopped-tracking-cases-vaccinated-2021-7 ⁠ CDC has stopped counting every 'breakthrough' Covid infection in fully vaccinated people: Experts warn agency's new method of only collecting data on patients who are hospitalized or die could miss patterns in who gets sick after their shots. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-9566619/CDC-stopped-counting-breakthrough-Covid-infection-fully-vaccinated-people.html


"Breakthrough" cases are infact cases of "vaccine failure". Why these vaccines are failing and what that process may include is explored below as we examine a extensive Japanese study which was published in August of 2021.

CDC study shows 74% of people infected in Massachusetts Covid outbreak were fully vaccinated[1]

"About three-fourths of people infected in a Massachusetts Covid-19 outbreak were fully vaccinated, according to new data published Friday by the CDC."
"The new data, published in the U.S. agency’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, also found that fully vaccinated people who get infected carry as much of the virus in their nose as unvaccinated people."

As we will see below more recent data revealed in August 2021, according to an article by Dr. Peter McCullough, "While moderating the symptoms of infection, the jab allows vaccinated individuals to carry unusually high viral loads without becoming ill at first, potentially transforming them into presymptomatic superspreaders." This is with vaccinated have viral loads 251 times that of unvaccinated according to an Oxford Clinical Research Group study.

This means the real danger is not from the unvaccinated individuals but from the vaccinated.

This is why top scientists in the world and most cited biologist in the history of Germany, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi believes the shots will contribute to the "decimation of human population" and warns against getting the injections.

At least one reason is the injection can induce ADE producing severe cytokine storms the next time injected people are exposed to a wild virus. The Japanese study linked below scientifically lays out the evidence of this "enhancement" taking place.

There are other studies as early as 2020 which were warning the science community of the dangers that ma accompany a vaccine. We have linked to the NHI funded study produced at Georgetown University outlining "The Possible Consequences of COVID-19 Vaccines" as early as 2020. But the real science media chose to push hysteria and hype rather than The Science. https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/1/36/htm


We have been told by the same media that your only hope is their vaccine. But we know now that if you get the shots you can still get sick and still transmit the virus, often at a higher rate as we will see in newer studies below. So, the only question left is can you survive their cure?

As of July 30th, Openvaers.com, an organization that monitors the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) online database, published the following adverse events (to the COVID vaccines) have been reported to the CDC:

  • 12,366 deaths
  • 46,036 hospitalizations
  • 68,040 urgent care visits
  • 4,759 cases of anaphylaxis
  • 4,044 cases of Bell's palsy
  • 14,251 permanently disabled

It has been accepted that only 1% to 10% of cases are actuall reported on Vaers which would mean the death and adverse injury tolls are actually much much higher.

  1. Published Fri, Jul 30 20212:34 PM EDTUpdated Fri, Jul 30 20218:27 PM EDT Berkeley Lovelace Jr. @BerkeleyJr