Difference between revisions of "Template:Contradictions of Paul 18"

From PreparingYou
Jump to: navigation, search
 
Line 1: Line 1:
<span style="color:#36c">'''False claim'''<Ref name=author></Ref>, "Paul's View of Justification versus Jesus' View of Justification"</span>
+
<span style="color:#36c">'''False claim'''<Ref name=author></Ref>, "Paul Teaches an Original Sin, But Jesus Contradicts"</span>
#:::::When Jesus uses the term “justified,” Jesus links it to repentance from sin. The publican who repents from sin in deep regret goes home “justified.” The Pharisee who does not do so and thinks he has nothing ever to regret, goes home unjustified. (Luke 18:14.) What does Paul teach instead? Paul says you are “justified by faith apart from the works of the Law.” (Rom. 4:2.) "But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifies the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness." (Romans 4:5, KJV.) Once that happens, we have “peace with God.” (Rom. 5:1.) Once ‘justified’ in that manner, “we shall be saved from the wrath [of God] through him.(Rom. 5:9.) Paul teaches a manner never to have regret again -- by the mere step of believing -- and you are justified while yet ungodly, i.e., unrepentant from sin. At least, this is how the young Luther and most construe Paul's meaning in Romans 4:5.
+
#:::"Paul has managed to contradict Jesus in almost every single area of faith and practice. Jesus says that there is no original sin (Mark 10:13-14) while Paul says there is (Rom. 5:12-14). ("Can Paul Be Trusted")"

Latest revision as of 09:09, 11 October 2017

False claim[1], "Paul Teaches an Original Sin, But Jesus Contradicts"

  1. "Paul has managed to contradict Jesus in almost every single area of faith and practice. Jesus says that there is no original sin (Mark 10:13-14) while Paul says there is (Rom. 5:12-14). ("Can Paul Be Trusted")"
  2. Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; no text was provided for refs named author